Civil Practice – Summary Judgment – Order – Findings of Fact – Conclusions of Law – Rule 52
Hodges v. Moore. (Lawyers Weekly No. 10-07-0664, 3 pp.) (Sanford L. Steelman Jr., J.) Appealed from Forsyth County Superior Court. (Judson D. DeRamus, J.) N.C. App.
Holding: A plaintiff trying to pierce the corporate veil in an attempt to recover from an individual corporate shareholder in a dispute over car-customizing work that was paid for but ...
Login required
You have clicked on a link to
information that is | ||
Already a paid subscriber but not registered for online access yet? For instructions on how to get premium web access, click here. |
||
Interested in Subscribing?
Start by choosing how you'd like your news delivered.
![]() - Print and Digital - | ![]() - Digital Only - |
![]() Try North Carolina Lawyers Weekly for a month |
Published: July 25, 2010
Time posted: 5:27 pm
Tags: Civil Practice, conclusions of law, findings of fact, order, rule 52, summary judgment






![[Print]](http://nclawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/print.png)
![[Email]](http://nclawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/email_2.png)
![[RSS Feed]](http://nclawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/rssfeed.png)
![[Facebook]](http://nclawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/facebook.png)
![[Twitter]](http://nclawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/twitter.png)



