Partnership – Contract With Partner – Knowledge of Partnership – Corporate – Piercing the Veil Claim

Partnership – Contract With Partner – Knowledge of Partnership – Corporate – Piercing the Veil Claim (access required)

Best Cartage, Inc. v. Stonewall Packaging, LLC Knowing about defendant Stonewall Packaging, LLC's partnership with defendant Jackson Paper Manufacturing Co., plaintiff nevertheless chose to enter into a contract with Stonewall alone. Plaintiff is bound by that choice and has no breach of contract claim against Jackson.

Login required


You have clicked on a link to information that is exclusive to NC Lawyers Weekly subscribers.

	Email Address: Password:	Already a paid subscriber but not registered for online access yet? For instructions on how to get premium web access, click here. Forgot Password?

Interested in Subscribing?

Start by choosing how you'd like your news delivered.

- Print and Digital -

- Digital Only -

POST A COMMENT

Comments are closed.

Most Important Opinions

Civil Practice – Foreign Judgment – Enforcement – Underlying Stipulation (access required)

Lumbermans Financial, LLC v. Poccia An unfiled, unincorporated stipulation formed part of the basis for a $250,000 consent judgment from a bankruptcy court in Michigan. The stipulation’s provision for a subsequent accounting is not enforceable under the Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act

Contract – Guaranty – Landlord/Tenant – Lease Renewal – Civil Practice – Default Judgment – Damages (access required)

Webb v. McJas, Inc. : Although plaintiff obtained entry of default against the defendant-guarantor, plaintiff’s own pleadings, attachments and evidence (presented at the hearing on damages) showed that the guarantor only guaranteed the original lease and not its extension.

Environmental – Sedimentation Pollution Control Act – Private Action – Violation Required – Civil Practice – Standing – Administrative (access required)

Applewood Properties, LLC v. New South Properties, LLC Because the county Natural Resources Department never found the defendant-contractor to be in violation of any law, rule, order or erosion and sedimentation and control plan, plaintiff did not have standing to bring a civil action under the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act to seek redress for its injuries.