Attorneys – Discipline – Censure – Lack of Diligence – Evidence – Unlisted WitnessNorth Carolina State Bar v. Hunter The defendant-attorney failed to serve process on a contractor and consultant, failed to have the summonses extended, and failed to answer the contractor and consultant’s complaint; moreover, she failed to file an answer on behalf of the same client in a separate matter. Defendant did not diligently represent her client. We affirm the State Bar Disciplinary Hearing Commission’s censure of defendant.
You have clicked on a link to
information that is
Already a paid subscriber but not registered for online access yet? For instructions on how to get premium web access, click here.
Interested in Subscribing?
Start by choosing how you'd like your news delivered.
- Print and Digital -
Try North Carolina Lawyers Weekly for a month
Published: December 8, 2011
Time posted: 9:22 am
Tags: Attorneys, Censure, discipline, evidence, Lack of Diligence, Unlisted Witness