Banks & Banking – Consumer Protection – Retail Installment Contract – Repossession – Notice – No Preemption
Epps v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA Federal regulations under the National Banking Act do not preempt a Maryland statute that governs repossession of personal property; Maryland has the right to regulate the notices lenders sent to borrowers before they repossess goods bought on a retail installment contract, and the 4th Circuit vacates dismissal of plaintiff car buyer’s putative class action.
Login required
You have clicked on a link to
information that is | ||
Already a paid subscriber but not registered for online access yet? For instructions on how to get premium web access, click here. |
||
Interested in Subscribing?
Start by choosing how you'd like your news delivered.
![]() - Print and Digital - | ![]() - Digital Only - |
![]() Try North Carolina Lawyers Weekly for a month |
Published: April 12, 2012
Time posted: 9:48 am
Tags: Banks & Banking, consumer protection, No Preemption, notice, Repossession, Retail Installment Contract






![[Print]](http://nclawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/print.png)
![[Email]](http://nclawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/email_2.png)
![[RSS Feed]](http://nclawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/rssfeed.png)
![[Facebook]](http://nclawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/facebook.png)
![[Twitter]](http://nclawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/twitter.png)



