Quantcast



Domestic Relations – Equitable Distribution – Trial Court’s Calculations – Remand (access required)

Schweizer v. Patterson The equitable distribution order appears (1) without explanation, to ignore the fact that certain assets were stipulated to be separate property and (2) to improperly consider passive increases to the value of separate property. Moreover, using the figures set out in the order, our calculations do not match those of the trial court.


POST A COMMENT

Comments are closed.


The Dolan Company