Attorneys – Sanctions – Civil Practice – Discovery – Deposition – Corporate Representative
Billips v. NC Benco Steel, Inc. Even though defendant substituted a new person as corporate representative at plaintiff’s deposition, this did not justify plaintiff leaving the deposition.
The magistrate judge’s award of sanctions against plaintiff’s counsel is affirmed.
Login required
You have clicked on a link to
information that is | ||
Already a paid subscriber but not registered for online access yet? For instructions on how to get premium web access, click here. |
||
Interested in Subscribing?
Start by choosing how you'd like your news delivered.
![]() - Print and Digital - | ![]() - Digital Only - |
![]() Try North Carolina Lawyers Weekly for a month |
Published: May 30, 2012
Time posted: 4:26 pm
Tags: Attorneys, Civil Practice, Corporate Representative, Deposition, discovery, sanctions






![[Print]](http://nclawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/print.png)
![[Email]](http://nclawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/email_2.png)
![[RSS Feed]](http://nclawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/rssfeed.png)
![[Facebook]](http://nclawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/facebook.png)
![[Twitter]](http://nclawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/twitter.png)



