Intellectual Property – Qui Tam Action – False Patent Marking – Expired Patent — Leahy-Smith America Invents Act – Retroactive – Constitutional – No Vested InterestSlack v. Bon Aqua International, Inc. Plaintiff’s qui tam complaint alleges that defendants marked certain products and related product packaging with expired (but previously valid) patents in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 292(a). However, during the pendency of this action, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act became law, and § 292(c) now states, “The marking of a product … with matter relating to a patent that covered that product but has expired is not a violation of this section.” Moreover, the Act applies retroactively to cases pending on the date of the Act’s enactment.
You have clicked on a link to
information that is
Already a paid subscriber but not registered for online access yet? For instructions on how to get premium web access, click here.
Interested in Subscribing?
Start by choosing how you'd like your news delivered.
- Print and Digital -
Try North Carolina Lawyers Weekly for a month
Published: June 4, 2012
Time posted: 5:09 pm
Tags: Constitutional, Expired Patent, False Patent Marking, Intellectual Property, Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, No Vested Interest, Qui Tam Action, Retroactive