Criminal Practice – Sexual Offense & Indecent Liberties – Evidence – Defendant’s Writings – Personality Test ResultsState v. Davis The state presented (1) evidence that defendant’s son’s underwear was stained with sperm that closely matched defendant’s DNA profile, (2) the child’s testimony that his father put “his private part in my mouth and my butt,” and (3) substantial corroborative evidence; however, defendant presented evidence (1) that defendant’s ex-wife could have placed his sperm in their son’s underwear, (2) of the ex-wife’s possible coaching of the child, and (3) of the conflict between defendant and his ex-wife. In light of this conflicting evidence, there is a reasonable possibility that the jury would have reached a different verdict if the trial court had not improperly admitted evidence of defendant’s composition-book entry in which he apparently confessed to anally raping an adult woman and of an expert assessment that defendant was a psychopathic deviant.
You have clicked on a link to
information that is
Already a paid subscriber but not registered for online access yet? For instructions on how to get premium web access, click here.
Interested in Subscribing?
Start by choosing how you'd like your news delivered.
- Print and Digital -
Try North Carolina Lawyers Weekly for a month
Published: June 22, 2012
Time posted: 8:42 am
Tags: Criminal Practice, Defendant’s Writings, evidence, Personality Test Results, Sexual Offense & Indecent Liberties