Contract – Performance Guaranty – Real Property – Development Agreement – Permit Extension Act – ‘Penal Bond’ – Prejudgment Interest
Synovus Bank v. County of Henderson When the defendant-surety’s principal failed to perform its obligations pursuant to a development contract with the defendant-county, the guarantor’s “penal bond” was payable in full.
Login required
You have clicked on a link to
information that is | ||
Already a paid subscriber but not registered for online access yet? For instructions on how to get premium web access, click here. |
||
Interested in Subscribing?
Start by choosing how you'd like your news delivered.
![]() - Print and Digital - | ![]() - Digital Only - |
![]() Try North Carolina Lawyers Weekly for a month |
Published: August 16, 2012
Time posted: 10:53 am
Tags: Contract, Development Agreement, Performance Guaranty, Permit Extension Act, Prejudgment Interest, Real Property, ‘Penal Bond’






![[Print]](http://nclawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/print.png)
![[Email]](http://nclawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/email_2.png)
![[RSS Feed]](http://nclawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/rssfeed.png)
![[Facebook]](http://nclawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/facebook.png)
![[Twitter]](http://nclawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/twitter.png)



