Quantcast



Constitutional – Felony Firearms Act – Summary Judgment (access required)

Baysden v. State Where our Court of Appeals held, The trial court erred by granting the state’s summary judgment motion and denying the summary judgment motion filed by plaintiff since he has a right under N.C. Const. art. I, § 30 to possess a firearm despite the prohibition set out in G.S. § 14-415.1, the Court of Appeals’ decision stands without precedential value.
By North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff 
Published: January 28, 2013
Time posted: 3:12 pm
Tags:


POST A COMMENT

Comments are closed.


The Dolan Company