Civil Practice – Pleadings – Motion to Amend – Newly Discovered Evidence – Undue Delay – False Representations
Kopf v. SmartFlow Technologies, Inc. Even though plaintiffs represented that they were turning over all their tangible property, since defendant alleged that plaintiffs had engaged in a “pattern of misconduct,” it was not improbable or unreasonable for defendant to suspect that a representation by plaintiffs might be false or require further investigation.
Login required
You have clicked on a link to
information that is | ||
Already a paid subscriber but not registered for online access yet? For instructions on how to get premium web access, click here. |
||
Interested in Subscribing?
Start by choosing how you'd like your news delivered.
![]() - Print and Digital - | ![]() - Digital Only - |
![]() Try North Carolina Lawyers Weekly for a month |






![[Print]](http://nclawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/print.png)
![[Email]](http://nclawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/email_2.png)
![[RSS Feed]](http://nclawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/rssfeed.png)
![[Facebook]](http://nclawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/facebook.png)
![[Twitter]](http://nclawyersweekly.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/twitter.png)



