Quantcast



Bankruptcy – Lien-Stripping Approved in Chapter 20 Cases (access required)

By North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff
Published: May 15,2013

Branigan v. TD Bank NA In a “Chapter 20” bankruptcy case – a Chapter 13 bankruptcy filed within four years of a Chapter 7 discharge – there is no per se rule barring lien-stripping, and the 4th Circuit affirms an order stripping off liens secured by collateral with no value to support them in this suit involving debtors’ residences


Bankruptcy – Plan – Objection to Confirmation – Household Size – Daughters in College (access required)

By North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff
Published: April 30,2013

In re Johnson While both of the debtor’s daughters are college students with scholarships, the debtor can claim only the younger daughter as a member of his household


Bankruptcy – Automatic Stay – Violation – Intellectual Property – Patent Licenses (access required)

By North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff
Published: April 30,2013

Angell v. Accugenomics, Inc. (In re Gene Express, Inc.) : On Oct. 1, 2010, the University of Toledo gave notice of termination of the debtor’s license rights to UT’s patents, effective Oct. 31, 2010.


Bankruptcy – Judicial Sale – Higher Bid – Motion to Reconsider (access required)

By North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff
Published: April 29,2013

In re Peterkin & Associates, Inc After this court approved the sale of the debtor’s property, a new bidder offered a substantially higher price.


Bankruptcy – Avoidance – Farmer & Silo Facility – Lines of Credit – Insolvency (access required)

By North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff
Published: April 29,2013

Angell v. Meherrin Agricultural & Chemical Co. (In re Tanglewood Farms, Inc. of Elizabeth City Although the complaint plausibly alleges that the proceeds from the lines of credit provided by the defendant-creditors went almost exclusively for the personal benefit of the debtor’s owner rather than the debtor, the debtor and its owner typically paid off the obligations to defendants as they came due until 2009.


Bankruptcy – Avoidance – Constructive Fraud Claim – Set Off (access required)

By North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff
Published: April 29,2013

Angell v. Montague Farms, Inc. (In re Tanglewood Farms, Inc. of Elizabeth City) When defendant paid the debtor for soybeans, it withheld from the payment the cost of the seeds the debtor had bought from defendant. This indirect and involuntary disposition of the debtor’s property was a “transfer” within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. § 101(54)(D) and § 548.


Bankruptcy – Fraud Claim – Retrieving Grain — Turnover & Accounting – Transfer Avoidance (access required)

By North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff
Published: April 29,2013

Angell v. C.A. Perry & Son, Inc. (In re Tanglewood Farms, Inc. of Elizabeth City) The debtor commingled its own grain with that of the defendant, sold much of the grain -- without informing defendant -- and kept all the proceeds. Upon learning of the debtor’s theft, defendant removed a million bushels of grain – about half of what it had stored with the debtor – from the debtor’s facility several months before the debtor filed bankruptcy.


Bankruptcy – Civil Practice – Standing – Appeals – No Stay – Real Property Sale (access required)

By North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff
Published: April 26,2013

In re Meade After the district court affirmed this court’s ruling that Bank of America’s deeds of trust on Lot 978 of Lake Sagamore Subdivision were invalid, the bank appealed to the Fourth Circuit; however, the bank failed to seek a stay pending appeal.


Bankruptcy – Civil Practice – Standing – Appeals – No Stay – Real Property Sale (access required)

By North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff
Published: April 26,2013

In re Meade After the district court affirmed this court’s ruling that Bank of America’s deeds of trust on Lot 978 of Lake Sagamore Subdivision were invalid, the bank appealed to the Fourth Circuit; however, the bank failed to seek a stay pending appeal. Since the bank has no liens on the real property, it is a general unsecured creditor, and since the debtor is in compliance with his plan as to general unsecured creditors, the bank has no standing to challenge the debtor’s sale of the property to his sister.


Bankruptcy – Preferential Transfers – Avoidance – Defenses – Ordinary Course of Business — Contemporaneous Value (access required)

By North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff
Published: April 26,2013

Sparkman v. American Residential Services, LLC (In re Anderson Homes, Inc. Before the 90-day preference period, on average, the debtor paid the creditor 48.83 days after a purchase order; during the preference period, the average was 95.23 days (or 96.26 days if disputed entries are excluded). This increase of 95.02 percent (or 97.13 percent if disputed entries are excluded) represents a substantial change in the parties’ dealings during the preference period from the pre-preference period.



The Dolan Company