Quantcast



Judges – Recusal – Personal bias – Sanctions (access required)

By North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff
Published: May 19,2011

Harrington v. Wall A motion for judicial recusal, filed by the defendant in a child support case, was properly denied for lack of any substantial showing of personal bias, prejudice or interest on the part of the judge.


Judges – Magistrate – Removal From Office – Assault (access required)

By dmc-admin
Published: June 14,2010

In re Mobley. (Lawyers Weekly No. 10-16-0528, 6 pp.) (Cheri Beasley, J.) Appealed from Hertford County Superior Court. (Robert H. Hobgood, J.) N.C. App. Unpub. Holding: Regardless of the verbal provocation by complainant or the long hours respondent had worked that day, respondent demonstrated blatant indifference to the law when he assaulted complaint, who was in [...]


Judges – Removal From Office — Corporate Directorship — Refusal to Resign — Misrepresentation (access required)

By dmc-admin
Published: April 26,2010

In re Inquiry Concerning Judge Belk. (Lawyers Weekly No. 10-06-0373, 16 pp.) (Per Curiam) (Sarah Parker, Ch.J., not participating) N.C. S. Ct. Holding: Despite being informed that the judicial canons required him to step down from his membership on corporate boards, respondent remained active on a board of directors and misrepresented his reasons for doing so [...]


Judges – Censure & Removal – Disrespect & Dishonesty – Attempted Cover- Up (access required)

By dmc-admin
Published: January 5,2009

In re Badgett. (Lawyers Weekly No. 08-06-1167, 13 pp.) A judge must not show disrespect to parties in his courtroom and certainly must not lie to an investigator looking into the incident, admonishes the N.C. Supreme Court. 21 NCLW 0877.


Judges – Censure & Removal – Disrespect & Dishonesty – Attempted Cover- Up (access required)

By dmc-admin
Published: October 20,2008

In re Badgett. (Lawyers Weekly No. 08-06-1167, 13 pp.) (Edward Thomas Brady, J.) From the Judicial Standards Commission. N.C. S.Ct. Holding: A judge must not show disrespect to parties in his courtroom and certainly must not lie to an investigator looking into the incident. Respondent is censured and removed from the office of judge. Respondent is disqualified [...]


Judges – Attorneys – Criminal Contempt – First Impression – Recusal – Judge’s Duty – Appeals (access required)

By dmc-admin
Published: June 23,2008

In re Marshall. (Lawyers Weekly No. 08-07-0692, 17 pp.) (Linda Stephens, J.) (Sanford L. Steelman Jr., J., dissenting) Appealed from Forsyth County Superior Court. (Michael E. Helms, J.) N.C. App. Holding: Where there was an appearance of bias on the judge’s part, it was his obligation to recuse himself from presiding over the criminal contempt proceeding [...]



The Dolan Company