Quantcast
Home / Opinion Digest / Zoning

Zoning-Constitutional – Due Process – Police Power – Civil Practice – Voluntary Dismissal – Racetrack – Municipal (access required)

Casola v. Caldwell County (Lawyers Weekly No. 14-16-0900, 9 pp.) (Ann Marie Calabria, J.) Appealed from Caldwell County Superior Court (Timothy Kincaid, J.) N.C. App. Unpub. Holding: The defendant-county presented multiple affidavits that sufficiently demonstrated that the county was acting ...

Read More »

Zoning – Environmental – High Impact Uses – Constitutional – Equal Protection – Commerce Clause – Preemption (access required)

PBK Holdings, LLC v. Cnty. of Rockingham (Lawyers Weekly No. 14-07-0296, 32 pp.) (J. Douglas McCullough, J.) Appealed from Rockingham County Superior Court (Richard L. Doughton, J.) N.C. App. Holding: We reject plaintiff’s argument that the Rockingham County’s ordinance defining ...

Read More »

Zoning – Fence Regulation – Constitutional — Procedural Due Process – Opportunity to Be Heard – Interpretation of Regulation (access required)

Lipinski v. Town of Summerfield Although petitioner had a property interest in his fence, his procedural due process rights were not violated, and he was afforded meaningful opportunity to be heard where the town sent written notice of the hearing, town officials answered petitioner’s questions in advance of the hearing, and petitioner had a chance to ask questions and testify at the hearing.

Read More »

Zoning – Court Upholds Denial of Substation Expansion (access required)

Washington Gas Light Co. v. Prince George’s County Council A gas company seeking to expand its natural gas substation in Prince George’s County, Md., cannot challenge the county’s denial of their request in this federal lawsuit; the 4th Circuit affirms the district court decision dismissing the company’s claim under the state’s “mandatory referral statute” and granting summary judgment to the county on state and federal preemption claims.

Read More »

Civil Practice – Statute of Repose – Real Property – Developer – Subdivision Road – Last Act (access required)

The Glens of Ironduff Property Owners Association, Inc. v. Daly Even though the road into plaintiff’s subdivision was paved in 2005, it has been used for access to the subdivision since before March 2004, and the last acts or omissions by the defendant-developer that allegedly led to the erosion of the road by an adjacent stream bed also took place before March 2004.

Read More »
Scroll To Top