<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>North Carolina Lawyers Weekly &#187; Constructive Trust</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nclawyersweekly.com/tag/constructive-trust/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nclawyersweekly.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:42:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tort/Negligence &#8211; Conversion &#8211; Funds &#8211; Bona Fide Purchaser &#8211; Tracing Funds &#8211; Constructive Trust &#8211; No Fiduciary Relationship &#8211; Other Circumstances&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2012/04/16/tortnegligence-conversion-funds-bona-fide-purchaser-tracing-funds-constructive-trust-no-fiduciary-relationship-other-circumstances/</link>
		<comments>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2012/04/16/tortnegligence-conversion-funds-bona-fide-purchaser-tracing-funds-constructive-trust-no-fiduciary-relationship-other-circumstances/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Most Important Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N.C. Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tort-Negligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bona Fide Purchaser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constructive Trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Fiduciary Relationship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other Circumstances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tort/Negligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tracing Funds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nclawyersweekly.com/?p=61713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Variety Wholesalers, Inc. v. Salem Logistics Traffic Services, LLC</em> Where plaintiff claims the defendant-lender converted funds that plaintiff transferred to the defendant-borrower, the court holds that funds transferred electronically may be sufficiently identified through evidence of the specific source, specific amount, and specific destination of the funds in question.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2012/04/16/tortnegligence-conversion-funds-bona-fide-purchaser-tracing-funds-constructive-trust-no-fiduciary-relationship-other-circumstances/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Domestic Relations &#8211; Separation Agreement &#8211; Court Orders &#8211; Trusts &amp; Estates &#8211; Husband’s Will &#8211; Tort/Negligence &#8211; Constructive Trust&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2012/04/11/domestic-relations-separation-agreement-court-orders-trusts-estates-husband%e2%80%99s-will-tortnegligence-constructive-trust/</link>
		<comments>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2012/04/11/domestic-relations-separation-agreement-court-orders-trusts-estates-husband%e2%80%99s-will-tortnegligence-constructive-trust/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 20:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Most Important Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N.C. Court of Appeals Unpublished]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constructive Trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Husband’s Will]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Separation Agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tort/Negligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trusts & estates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nclawyersweekly.com/?p=61589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>MacMillan v. MacMillan</em> A decedent’s first wife has stated a claim for a constructive trust against the decedent’s widow when the first wife alleges that the decedent was under court order to leave her $38,000 but he arranged his finances so that his widow received the money instead.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2012/04/11/domestic-relations-separation-agreement-court-orders-trusts-estates-husband%e2%80%99s-will-tortnegligence-constructive-trust/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trusts &amp; Estates &#8211; Civil Practice &#8211; Statute of Limitations &#8211; Incompetent Adult &#8211; Appointment of Guardian &#8211; Real Property &#8211; Constructive Trust&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2012/02/14/trusts-estates-civil-practice-statute-of-limitations-incompetent-adult-appointment-of-guardian-real-property-constructive-trust/</link>
		<comments>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2012/02/14/trusts-estates-civil-practice-statute-of-limitations-incompetent-adult-appointment-of-guardian-real-property-constructive-trust/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Most Important Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N.C. Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trusts and Estates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appointment of Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constructive Trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Incompetent Adult]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statute of Limitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trusts & estates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nclawyersweekly.com/?p=60343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Estate of Formyduval v. Yeddo</em>Even though plaintiffs’ decedent was allegedly incompetent when she transferred property to defendants during the 1990’s, since the decedent was declared incompetent on Aug. 13, 1999 and a guardian was appointed for her on Sept. 3, 1999, the statute of limitations on plaintiffs’ constructive trust claim began running on Sept. 3, 1999.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2012/02/14/trusts-estates-civil-practice-statute-of-limitations-incompetent-adult-appointment-of-guardian-real-property-constructive-trust/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Domestic Relations &#8211; Consent Order &#8211; Parent &amp; Child &#8211; Death Benefits &#8211; Constructive Trust&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2011/07/11/domestic-relations-consent-order-parent-child-death-benefits-constructive-trust/</link>
		<comments>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2011/07/11/domestic-relations-consent-order-parent-child-death-benefits-constructive-trust/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 12:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Most Important Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N.C. Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consent Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constructive Trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parent & child]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nclawyersweekly.com/?p=56738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Myers v. Myers </em>A consent order’s requirement that the decedent-father name his third son as a 33 percent beneficiary of the “death benefits” from his employment unambiguously referred not only to the decedent’s life insurance but also to his retirement accounts.

We affirm the imposition of a constructive trust on the death benefits from the decedent’s retirement accounts for the benefit of his youngest son, Travis.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2011/07/11/domestic-relations-consent-order-parent-child-death-benefits-constructive-trust/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tort/Negligence &#8211; Conversion &#8211; Money &#8211; Exact Funds &#8211; Constructive Trust &#8211; No Fiduciary Relationship&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2011/06/10/tortnegligence-conversion-money-exact-funds-constructive-trust-no-fiduciary-relationship/</link>
		<comments>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2011/06/10/tortnegligence-conversion-money-exact-funds-constructive-trust-no-fiduciary-relationship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Most Important Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N.C. Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tort-Negligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constructive Trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exact Funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Fiduciary Relationship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tort/Negligence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nclawyersweekly.com/?p=56161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Variety Wholesalers, Inc. v. Salem Logistics Traffic Services, LLC</em> In the parties' agreement for defendant Salem Logistics to audit plaintiff's freight bills, plaintiff did not specify that Salem was required to pay plaintiff's carriers with the same exact funds that plaintiff transferred to Salem. In fact, plaintiff's witnesses said it would have been fine for Salem to pay plaintiff's carriers out of Salem's general funds. Therefore, plaintiff failed to show that Salem accepted the payments with the intent to redeliver the exact funds.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2011/06/10/tortnegligence-conversion-money-exact-funds-constructive-trust-no-fiduciary-relationship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real Property &#8211; Summary Judgment &#8211; Breach of Contract &#8211; Breach of Warranty &#8211; Fraud &#8211; Unfair &amp; Deceptive Trade Practices &#8211; Constructive Trust &#8211; Fiduciary Relationship&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2011/02/23/real-property-summary-judgment-breach-of-contract-breach-of-warranty-fraud-unfair-deceptive-trade-practices-constructive-trust-fiduciary-relationship/</link>
		<comments>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2011/02/23/real-property-summary-judgment-breach-of-contract-breach-of-warranty-fraud-unfair-deceptive-trade-practices-constructive-trust-fiduciary-relationship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Most Important Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N.C. Court of Appeals Unpublished]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breach of Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breach of Warranty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catawba County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constructive Trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiduciary Relationship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summary judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nclawyersweekly.com/?p=54409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Scheller v. Otterberg</em>. The plaintiff-buyers hired an inspector, who warned them of possible water intrusion into the home they were buying. Even if the plaintiffs relied on false representations . . .]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2011/02/23/real-property-summary-judgment-breach-of-contract-breach-of-warranty-fraud-unfair-deceptive-trade-practices-constructive-trust-fiduciary-relationship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Man must pay jilted fiancée $130K for reneging on engagement&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2011/01/06/man-must-pay-jilted-fiancee-130k-for-reneging-on-engagement/</link>
		<comments>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2011/01/06/man-must-pay-jilted-fiancee-130k-for-reneging-on-engagement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 15:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sylvia Adcock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verdicts & Settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breach of Contract to Marry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breach of Fiduciary Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constructive Trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDowell County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nclawyersweekly.com/?p=53596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A McDowell County jury has awarded $130,000 to a woman who was dumped by her fiancé in a breach-of-contract-to-marry claim, a common-law tort that is rarely seen today. The case involved a young woman who worked in her older boyfriend's convenience stores. He asked her to marry him, she accepted, and he told her that they would eventually sell the convenience stores and she would never have to worry about money, according to the plaintiff's attorney, Steven Kropelnicki Jr. (pictured) of Asheville.


]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2011/01/06/man-must-pay-jilted-fiancee-130k-for-reneging-on-engagement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civil Practice &#8211; Interlocutory Appeal &#8211; Substantial Right &#8211; Contract &#8211; Lis Pendens &#8211; Constructive Trust &#8211; Dismissal&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2010/11/09/civil-practice-interlocutory-appeal-substantial-right-contract-lis-pendens-constructive-trust-dismissal/</link>
		<comments>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2010/11/09/civil-practice-interlocutory-appeal-substantial-right-contract-lis-pendens-constructive-trust-dismissal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 15:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N.C. Court of Appeals Unpublished]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brunswick County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constructive Trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dismissal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interlocutory Appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lis pendens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Substantial Right]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nclawyersweekly.com/?p=52707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Superior Construction Corp. v. Intracoastal Living, LLC. (Lawyers Weekly No. 10-16-1067, 9 pp.) (Martha A. Geer, J.) Appealed from Brunswick County Superior Court (John R. Jolly Jr., J.) N.C. App. Unpub. Click here for the full text of the opinion. Holding: Since the plaintiff&#8217;s appeal is interlocutory and has not been certified by the trial [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2010/11/09/civil-practice-interlocutory-appeal-substantial-right-contract-lis-pendens-constructive-trust-dismissal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
