The good news is that the Mayans got it wrong. The bad news may be that you’ve delayed dealing with all of those labor and employment problems in the hopes that the world would have ended by now.
Tate v. North Carolina Department of State Treasurer, Retirement Systems Division When petitioner returned to work for the Greensboro ABC Board in the same month in which he retired from the Board, petitioner’s retirement in the Local Government Employees Retirement System became null and void.
Bulloch v. North Carolina Department of Crime Control & Public Safety Although petitioner’s voluntary consumption of alcohol contributed to his inappropriate off-duty behavior, a psychiatrist testified that petitioner’s behavior was caused by a combination of alcohol, his first dose of lithium, hypomania, and his being “relatively unmedicated for his bipolar disorder.”
New Breed, Inc. v. Golden Plaintiff’s complaint can be fairly read to allege common law unfair competition, which can fall outside the ambit of G.S. Chapter 75; therefore, this action was correctly designated as a complex business case.
J.W. v. Johnston County Board of Education Since no N.C. appellate court has recognized a fiduciary duty between a middle school student and his principal, superintendent or school board, this court will not so expand N.C. law.
Thompson v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education After plaintiff’s return from California and her completion of a one-year teaching contract, the defendant-school board should have voted on tenure status for plaintiff, who had career status as a teacher before she moved to California.
Thompson v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education After plaintiff’s return from California and her completion of a one-year teaching contract, the defendant-school board should have voted on tenure status for plaintiff, who had career status as a teacher before she moved to California.
Tong v. Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp. The issue raised by plaintiff’s complaint is purely legal: whether defendant Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp. is operating defendant DSSKK as a mere instrumentality, thereby making Dassault jointly and severally liable to plaintiff for his “Japanese Retirement Allowance.” This claim is not dependent on future uncertainties and is therefore ripe for review.
Whitaker v. Nash County Although plaintiff did file an EEOC charge alleging race discrimination, since (1) her doctor would not certify her as fit at the end of her 12 weeks of FMLA leave, (2) defendants determined that plaintiff’s position was critical, and (3) plaintiff did not take defendants up on their offer to suggest accommodations, plaintiff has not shown that her termination was in retaliation for her EEOC charge.
George v. Roush & Yates Racing Engines, LLC Plaintiff alleges that the defendant-employer used plaintiff’s failure to attend a meeting as a pretext for firing plaintiff and that the real reason for his firing was the disabilities he suffered after an auto accident. Plaintiff’s allegations state a claim for violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act.