<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>North Carolina Lawyers Weekly &#187; Negligent Misrepresentation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nclawyersweekly.com/tag/negligent-misrepresentation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nclawyersweekly.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:42:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Contract &#8211; Civil Practice &#8211; Pleadings Amendment — Cable Installation &#8211; Price Increase Term &#8211; Quantum Meruit &#8211; Unfair Trade Practices &#8211; Negligent Misrepresentation&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2012/01/11/contract-civil-practice-pleadings-amendment-%e2%80%94-cable-installation-price-increase-term-quantum-meruit-unfair-trade-practices-negligent-misrepresentation/</link>
		<comments>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2012/01/11/contract-civil-practice-pleadings-amendment-%e2%80%94-cable-installation-price-increase-term-quantum-meruit-unfair-trade-practices-negligent-misrepresentation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 21:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Most Important Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N.C. Business Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cable Installation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negligent Misrepresentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pleadings Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Price Increase Term]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quantum Meruit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unfair Trade Practices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nclawyersweekly.com/?p=59679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Diverse Networks v. Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership </em>Even though neither the complaint nor the answer makes any reference to the parties’ 2002 contract, their briefs discuss at length the terms and application of law to the 2002 contract as if it is the most important point of contention between the parties. The evidence and arguments presented by both parties have placed an unpleaded claim before the court.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2012/01/11/contract-civil-practice-pleadings-amendment-%e2%80%94-cable-installation-price-increase-term-quantum-meruit-unfair-trade-practices-negligent-misrepresentation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Insurance &#8211; Disability – ‘Any Employment’ – Tort/Negligence – Negligent Misrepresentation&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2011/09/09/insurance-disability-%e2%80%93-%e2%80%98any-employment%e2%80%99-%e2%80%93-tortnegligence-%e2%80%93-negligent-misrepresentation/</link>
		<comments>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2011/09/09/insurance-disability-%e2%80%93-%e2%80%98any-employment%e2%80%99-%e2%80%93-tortnegligence-%e2%80%93-negligent-misrepresentation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 18:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Most Important Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N.C. Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negligent Misrepresentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tort/Negligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[‘Any Employment’]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nclawyersweekly.com/?p=57917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Cobb v. Pennsylvania Life Insurance Co. </em>The disability insurance policy provided to the plaintiff-landscaper explained that he would not be considered disabled if he could engage in “any employment”; since plaintiff had a duty to read the policy, he cannot prove that he reasonably relied on any alleged misrepresentation made by the defendant-insurance agent.

We affirm summary judgment for defendants.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2011/09/09/insurance-disability-%e2%80%93-%e2%80%98any-employment%e2%80%99-%e2%80%93-tortnegligence-%e2%80%93-negligent-misrepresentation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real Property &#8211; Restrictive Covenants – Record Notice – Tort/Negligence – Negligent Misrepresentation — Civil Practice – Appeals&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2011/08/19/real-property-restrictive-covenants-%e2%80%93-record-notice-%e2%80%93-tortnegligence-%e2%80%93-negligent-misrepresentation-%e2%80%94-civil-practice-%e2%80%93-appeals/</link>
		<comments>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2011/08/19/real-property-restrictive-covenants-%e2%80%93-record-notice-%e2%80%93-tortnegligence-%e2%80%93-negligent-misrepresentation-%e2%80%94-civil-practice-%e2%80%93-appeals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 21:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Most Important Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N.C. Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negligent Misrepresentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Record Notice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restrictive covenants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tort/Negligence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nclawyersweekly.com/?p=57615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Barfield v. Matos </em>Even though the seller mistakenly told the buyer that the land he was buying was not subject to any restrictions that would prevent him from farming the land, since the restrictive covenants on the land were filed with the Register of Deeds, the buyer’s reliance on the seller’s misrepresentation was not reasonable.

We affirm summary judgment for the third-party defendants. We lack jurisdiction to consider the defendant/third-party plaintiff’s arguments related to the trial court’s grant of partial summary judgment for plaintiffs.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2011/08/19/real-property-restrictive-covenants-%e2%80%93-record-notice-%e2%80%93-tortnegligence-%e2%80%93-negligent-misrepresentation-%e2%80%94-civil-practice-%e2%80%93-appeals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tort/Negligence &#8211; Unfair Trade Practices &#8211; Labor &amp; Employment &#8211; Other Businesses — Negligent Misrepresentation &#8211; Justifiable Reliance&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2011/06/22/tortnegligence-unfair-trade-practices-labor-employment-other-businesses-%e2%80%94-negligent-misrepresentation-justifiable-reliance/</link>
		<comments>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2011/06/22/tortnegligence-unfair-trade-practices-labor-employment-other-businesses-%e2%80%94-negligent-misrepresentation-justifiable-reliance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Most Important Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N.C. Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tort-Negligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justifiable Reliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor & Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negligent Misrepresentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other Businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tort/Negligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unfair Trade Practices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nclawyersweekly.com/?p=56382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Songwooyarn Trading Co. v. Sox Eleven, Inc. </em>Even though defendant Ahn was plaintiff’s employee, since he interfered in the relationship between separate companies, his actions were “in commerce” within the meaning of G.S. Chapter 75.

We affirm a $1,022,041 judgment for plaintiff.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2011/06/22/tortnegligence-unfair-trade-practices-labor-employment-other-businesses-%e2%80%94-negligent-misrepresentation-justifiable-reliance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tort/Negligence &#8211; Fraud &#8211; Negligent Misrepresentation &#8211; Unfair Trade Practices &#8211; Real Property &#8211; Purchase&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2011/04/13/tortnegligence-fraud-negligent-misrepresentation-unfair-trade-practices-real-property-purchase/</link>
		<comments>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2011/04/13/tortnegligence-fraud-negligent-misrepresentation-unfair-trade-practices-real-property-purchase/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 13:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Froom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Most Important Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N.C. Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henderson County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negligent Misrepresentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Purchase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tort/Negligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unfair Trade Practices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nclawyersweekly.com/?p=55216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Mauro v. Mooney</em>. Even though the plaintiff-buyers contend the defendant-seller committed fraud and negligent misrepresentation as to the age of the house, renovations, structural deficiencies . . .]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2011/04/13/tortnegligence-fraud-negligent-misrepresentation-unfair-trade-practices-real-property-purchase/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Banks &amp; Banking &#8211; Breach of Duty &#8211; Negligent Misrepresentation &#8211; Derivative Claims&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2011/03/10/banks-banking-breach-of-duty-negligent-misrepresentation-derivative-claims/</link>
		<comments>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2011/03/10/banks-banking-breach-of-duty-negligent-misrepresentation-derivative-claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Banks And Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N.C. Business Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banks & Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breach of Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derivative Claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negligent Misrepresentation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nclawyersweekly.com/?p=54679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Browne v. Thompson. (Lawyers Weekly No. 11-15-0255, 21 pp.) (John Jolly, J.) N.C. Bus. Ct. Click here for the full text of the opinion. Holding: In a case in which a bank purchased a mortgage company associated with risky loans, shareholders of the bank cannot claim that the action caused them to lose money because [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2011/03/10/banks-banking-breach-of-duty-negligent-misrepresentation-derivative-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Contract &#8211; Master Agreement &#8211; Breach of Contract &#8211; Fraud &#8211; Constructive Fraud &#8211; Negligent Misrepresentation &#8211; Interference with Contract &#8211; Summary Judgment&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2011/03/09/contract-master-agreement-breach-of-contract-fraud-constructive-fraud-negligent-misrepresentation-interference-with-contract-summary-judgment/</link>
		<comments>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2011/03/09/contract-master-agreement-breach-of-contract-fraud-constructive-fraud-negligent-misrepresentation-interference-with-contract-summary-judgment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 14:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N.C. Business Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breach of Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constructive Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interference With Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Master Agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negligent Misrepresentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summary judgment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nclawyersweekly.com/?p=54666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  Crockett Capital Corp. v. Inland American Winston Hotels, Inc. (Lawyers Weekly No. 11-15-0257, 51 pp.) (Judge Ben F. Tennille) On cross motions for summary judgment. N.C. Bus. Ct. Click here for the full text of the opinion. Holding: The master agreement between the two sophisticated parties to the agreement is an enforceable contract, even [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2011/03/09/contract-master-agreement-breach-of-contract-fraud-constructive-fraud-negligent-misrepresentation-interference-with-contract-summary-judgment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
