<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>North Carolina Lawyers Weekly &#187; Real Party in Interest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nclawyersweekly.com/tag/real-party-in-interest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nclawyersweekly.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 21:09:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Civil Practice &#8211; Real Party in Interest – Real Property – Taxation – County Commission&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2012/12/28/civil-practice-real-party-in-interest-real-property-taxation-county-commission/</link>
		<comments>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2012/12/28/civil-practice-real-party-in-interest-real-property-taxation-county-commission/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 18:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Most Important Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N.C. Court of Appeals Unpublished]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[County Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Party in Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nclawyersweekly.com/?p=69137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Broughton v. County Commission </em>Since plaintiff was challenging the valuation of her Wake County real property for tax purposes, the county was the proper defendant.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2012/12/28/civil-practice-real-party-in-interest-real-property-taxation-county-commission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civil Practice &#8211; Joinder – Counterclaims – Current Party – First Impression – Real Party in Interest – Corporate&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2012/07/12/civil-practice-joinder-counterclaims-current-party-first-impression-real-party-in-interest-corporate/</link>
		<comments>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2012/07/12/civil-practice-joinder-counterclaims-current-party-first-impression-real-party-in-interest-corporate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 13:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Most Important Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N.C. Business Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counterclaims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first impression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joinder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Party in Interest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nclawyersweekly.com/?p=63968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Nelson v. Alliance Hospitality Management, LLC</em> A plaintiff cannot compel one defendant to join in another defendant’s counterclaim. Motion denied. Plaintiff cites no case, and the court has found none, in which an N.C. court has compelled a party already present in a lawsuit to join additional claims or counterclaims.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2012/07/12/civil-practice-joinder-counterclaims-current-party-first-impression-real-party-in-interest-corporate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Corporate &#8211; Merger – Civil Practice – Pleadings Amendment – Relation Back – Real Party in Interest – Intellectual Property – Patent Application – Tort/Negligence – Attorneys – Legal Malpractice&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2012/03/19/corporate-merger-%e2%80%93-civil-practice-%e2%80%93-pleadings-amendment-%e2%80%93-relation-back-%e2%80%93-real-party-in-interest-%e2%80%93-intellectual-property-%e2%80%93-patent-application/</link>
		<comments>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2012/03/19/corporate-merger-%e2%80%93-civil-practice-%e2%80%93-pleadings-amendment-%e2%80%93-relation-back-%e2%80%93-real-party-in-interest-%e2%80%93-intellectual-property-%e2%80%93-patent-application/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 17:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Most Important Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N.C. Business Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Malpractice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pleadings Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Party in Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relation Back]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tort/Negligence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nclawyersweekly.com/?p=61093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Revolutionary Concepts, Inc. v. Clements Walker PLLC</em> Although an inventor had assigned his patent rights to a Nevada corporation, a North Carolina corporation hired the defendant-law firm to apply for the patents. The Nevada corporation filed this action to assert its rights as assignee. Subsequently, the two corporations merged, with the Nevada corporation being the surviving entity. The Nevada corporation did not file a professional negligence action within the statute of limitations, and an amendment to its pleadings now would not relate back to the filing of this action.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2012/03/19/corporate-merger-%e2%80%93-civil-practice-%e2%80%93-pleadings-amendment-%e2%80%93-relation-back-%e2%80%93-real-party-in-interest-%e2%80%93-intellectual-property-%e2%80%93-patent-application/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Contract &#8211; Civil Practice &#8211; Real Party in Interest &#8211; Corporate Owner &#8211; Stipulation &#8211; Evidence &#8211; Photographs &#8211; Illustrative to Substantive&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2010/11/02/contract-civil-practice-real-party-in-interest-corporate-owner-stipulation-evidence-photographs-illustrative-to-substantive/</link>
		<comments>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2010/11/02/contract-civil-practice-real-party-in-interest-corporate-owner-stipulation-evidence-photographs-illustrative-to-substantive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 14:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Most Important Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N.C. Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate owner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illustrative to substantive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photographs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Party in Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stipulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watauga County]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nclawyersweekly.com/?p=52570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Accelerated Framing, Inc. v. Eagle Ridge Builders, Inc.</em>. Although defendant contends on appeal that its contract was signed by David Gentry (president and owner of the plaintiff-corporation) in his individual capacity, at trial defendant stipulated that the contract was between the corporate parties. Even though subject matter jurisdiction cannot be waived, a real party in interest can ratify an action by stipulation. We affirm judgment for plaintiff.

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2010/11/02/contract-civil-practice-real-party-in-interest-corporate-owner-stipulation-evidence-photographs-illustrative-to-substantive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Contract &#8211; Corporate &#8211; Civil Practice &#8211; Real Party in Interest &#8211; Tort/Negligence &#8211; Summer Camps&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2010/09/15/contract-corporate-civil-practice-real-party-in-interest-tortnegligence-summer-camps/</link>
		<comments>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2010/09/15/contract-corporate-civil-practice-real-party-in-interest-tortnegligence-summer-camps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 14:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N.C. Court of Appeals Unpublished]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnston County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Party in Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tort/Negligence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nclawyersweekly.com/?p=51614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephenson v. Langdon. (Lawyers Weekly No. 10-16-0904, 19 pp.) (Linda Stephens, J.) Appealed from Johnston County Superior Court. (Thomas H. Lock, J.) N.C. App. Unpub. Holding: Plaintiffs cannot show the individual defendants breached a contract because the plaintiffs&#8217; contract was only with the corporate defendant. Summary judgment for defendants is affirmed. Evidence of the contract [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2010/09/15/contract-corporate-civil-practice-real-party-in-interest-tortnegligence-summer-camps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
