<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>North Carolina Lawyers Weekly &#187; Third-Party Statements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nclawyersweekly.com/tag/third-party-statements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nclawyersweekly.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:49:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Criminal Practice &#8211; Evidence &#8211; First Impression — Police Interview &#8211; Accusations -Third-Party Statements&#160;</title>
		<link>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2011/08/19/criminal-practice-evidence-first-impression-%e2%80%94-police-interview-accusations-third-party-statements/</link>
		<comments>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2011/08/19/criminal-practice-evidence-first-impression-%e2%80%94-police-interview-accusations-third-party-statements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Most Important Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N.C. Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accusations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first impression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police Interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Third-Party Statements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nclawyersweekly.com/?p=57530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>State v. Castaneda </em>During a recorded interview of defendant, a detective told defendant that he believed defendant was lying. The detective’s remarks were admissible as statements providing the context surrounding defendant’s inculpatory responses - statements relevant to the murder charge.

We find no error in defendant’s conviction of second-degree murder.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nclawyersweekly.com/2011/08/19/criminal-practice-evidence-first-impression-%e2%80%94-police-interview-accusations-third-party-statements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
