Quantcast
Home / Opinion Digests / Civil Practice / Civil Practice – Sanctions – Rule 11 – Rule 7 Specificity – Gatekeeper Order – Discovery Motion (access required)

Civil Practice – Sanctions – Rule 11 – Rule 7 Specificity – Gatekeeper Order – Discovery Motion (access required)

Fatta v. M & M Properties Management, Inc. Defendant’s motion for sanctions cited Rule 11 and specified that plaintiff’s own motion for sanctions was “frivolous and insufficient as a matter of law.” In addition, defendant’s motion to strike cited Rule 12(f) and specified that plaintiff’s motions “contain[ed] irrelevant outrageous assertions….” Therefore, defendant’s motions did not violate N.C. R. Civ. P. 7(b)(1).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*