Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Bumper Stumper

Laurie Landsittel//July 11, 2014

Bumper Stumper

Laurie Landsittel//July 11, 2014

There was a game show in the late eighties called Bumper Stumpers where contestants had to decipher vanity license plates. Recently, it seems that that the state agencies given the duty to approve or deny certain vanity plates are the ones being stumped, because courts are increasingly calling the words or phrases on these plates free speech.

Since July, 2013 the state of Indiana does not allow drivers to purchase vanity plates, because a police officer with the help of the ACLU sued the Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles (BMV) for revoking his license plate, because he opted to have the word 0INK on his plate. Local Indiana judge, James Osborn, said that the state of Indiana was violating the officer’s freedom of speech and ordered the BMV to restore the program with strict guidelines until new rules were written that do not violate the First Amendment. The agency plans to appeal the decision to the Indiana Supreme Court.

Judge Osborn said the BMV does not have formal regulations for evaluating the words on vanity plates and he said the agency was inconsistent in its decisions on these plates, because it allowed plates that said “B HOLY” and HOLYONE, but denied an application for a plate that said “UNHOLY.”

The BMV argued that the ruling made it possible for a driver to obtain a vanity plate with words or phrases offensive to ethnic groups, but the ACLU contended that the BMV is still allowed to deny applications for plates that are defamatory, vulgar or could incite violence.

BMV Commissioner Donald M. Snemis told The Associated Press that the Indiana Supreme Court could force the Indiana legislature to rewrite the law, which could lead to a permanent ban on vanity plates in the state.

In February, 2014, the Fourth Circuit ruled that a North Carolina vanity plate that said “CHOOSE LIFE” was unconstitutional, because it did not allow an alternative plate for pro choicers. ACLU of North Carolina attorney Chris Brook said in a written statement that the ruling “protects the right of North Carolinians of all political beliefs to have equal access to avenues for free speech.”

Top Legal News

See All Top Legal News


See All Commentary