Pugh Oil Co. v. Ace Transport, Ltd. The parties’ gasoline-delivery contract required defendant to get approval from plaintiff before defendant delivered unbranded gasoline to one of plaintiff’s BP or Exxon stations. Defendant contends that plaintiff waived defendant’s breach of this contract provision when plaintiff accepted defendant’s invoices which indicated that unbranded gasoline had been delivered to the BP and Exxon stations; however, upon review of the invoices, the court cannot discern whether the documents show unbranded or branded fuel at incorrect stations.Read More »
Contract – Joint Venture — Real Property – Failed Development – Promissory Note – Tort/Negligence – Unfair Trade Practices
Synovus Bank v. Parks Where defendants’ joint venture counterclaim alleges only that the third-party defendant “failed to properly supervise and oversee the Developer or its employees and agents despite having some measure to direct the conduct of the Developer,” this allegation is a conclusion of law and is not supported by any of the facts pled in defendants’ counterclaim and third-party complaint. Defendants have failed to plead sufficient facts to show that plaintiff had a right of control over the means to carry out an alleged joint venture with the developer;Read More »
Hart v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp. Even though the parties’ express warranty period extends beyond the six-year statute of repose, in view of Christie v. Hartley Construction, Inc., 745 S.E.2d 60 (N.C. App. 2013), since plaintiffs’ claims were filed outside the statute of repose period, and since the warranty provides only for money damages, plaintiffs’ claims are barred by the statute of repose.Read More »
Duke University Health System, Inc. v. Sparrow A patient still has to pay his hospital bill, despite his son’s belief that nurses’ poor hygiene led to the patient’s contraction of a preventable hospital-acquired infection. We affirm summary judgment for the hospital.Read More »
State v. Cortez Although the bail agent placed the name of one of appellant International Fidelity Insurance Co.’s competitors on the face of Form AOC-CR-201, the agent attached to the form a power of attorney that evidenced his authority to execute a bond for International.Read More »
Rabun County Bank v. Earnhardt: Although there is a deed of trust securing the promissory note signed by defendants, the plaintiff-bank was not required to foreclose on the deed of trust before suing defendants on their promissory note. We affirm judgment on the pleadings for the bank.
Tagged with: foreclosureRead More »
Contract – Sale of Goods — Oral Agreement – Admission – Accord & Satisfaction – Evidence – Business Records
Jackson v. Cape Fear Turf Farm, Inc Even though the parties’ oral contract for the purchase and sale of sod would ordinarily be unenforceable under the UCC, since defendant admitted the existence of the contract in its answer, the contract is enforceable. We reverse judgment for defendant and remand.
Tagged with: UnenforceableRead More »
Contract – Emails – Alleged Oral Contract – Quantum Meruit – Civil Practice – Summary Judgment – Motion to Continue
Taft v. Dickman Even though plaintiffs placed evidence of an oral contract in the trial court record, plaintiffs only relied on the parties’ emails – their written agreement – in their arguments at the trial level. Plaintiffs may not have summary judgment for defendants overturned based on an argument plaintiffs did not make before the trial court, i.e., that the parties had an oral contract with terms that varied from their written contract.
Tagged with: trial courtRead More »
Grich v. Mantelco, LLC Plaintiff signed the release before actually receiving the check from the defendant-insurer and so did not realize that the insurer had deducted from the settlement amount the $7,000 that it has previously paid the plaintiff. This unilateral mistake by the plaintiff does not support his claim that the insurer committed an unfair trade practice.Read More »
Contract – Franchise – Covenant Not to Compete – Civil Practice – Preliminary Injunction – Geographic & Business-Type Scope
Outdoor Lighting Perspectives Franchising, Inc. v. Harders In the context of the nonrenewal of a franchise, a covenant not to compete is governed by a hybrid standard, combining the types of review applied to non-compete covenants in both the employer-employee and business sale contexts.Read More »