Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home (page 6)

Tag Archives: Alimony

Domestic Relations – Failure to Join Party – Equitable Distribution – Valuation of Marital Assets – Alimony – Notice Pleading (access required)

Quesinberry v. Quesinberry. (Lawyers Weekly No. 11-07-0339, 27 pp.) (John C. Martin, C.J.) Appealed from Surry County District Court. (Charles M. Neaves Jr. & Angela B. Puckett, JJ.). N.C. App. Click here for the full text of the opinion. Holding: ...

Read More »

Domestic Relations – Equitable Distribution – Alimony – Child Support – Insufficient Findings (access required)

Robinson v. Robinson. (Lawyers Weekly No. 11-07-0276, 27 pp.) (John C. Martin, Ch.J.) Appealed from Guilford County District Court. (Wendy M. Enochs, J.) N.C. App. Click here for the full text of the opinion. Holding: After a hearing at which ...

Read More »

Domestic Relations – Alimony – First Impression – Prior Statutes – Term Award – No Modification – Military Pension (access required)

Cathey v. Cathey. (Lawyers Weekly No. 11-07-0205, 9 pp.) (Ann Marie Calabria, J.) Appealed from Cumberland County District Court. (Laura A. Devan, J.) N.C. App. Click here for the full text of the opinion. Holding: The Veterans’ Administration has increased ...

Read More »

Domestic Relations – Marital Property – Valuation – Alimony – Attorney’s Fees – Equitable Distribution (access required)

Johnson-White v. White. (Lawyers Weekly No. 11-16-0185, 25 pp.) (Ann Marie Calabria, J.) Appealed from New Hanover County Superior Court. (J.H. Corpening, J.) N.C. App. Unpub. Click here for the full text of the opinion. Holding: The trial court did ...

Read More »

Domestic Relations – Alimony – First Impression – Health Insurance – Marital Misconduct – Termination Events – Equitable Distribution – IRA (access required)

Lucas v. Lucas. Like other types of insurance, health insurance can be part of alimony. Although the trial court could order the defendant-husband to maintain health insurance for the plaintiff-wife, the . . .

Read More »

Domestic Relations – Alimony – Bonus Income – Family-Owned Company – Income Suppression Finding Unnecessary – Corporate Income – Attorney’s Fees (access required)

Webb v. Webb. Where the defendant-husband's family controls his salary and bonuses, the trial court was not required to find that the husband was suppressing his income when the court ordered the husband to pay half of any bonus he received (up to a stated ceiling) to the plaintiff-wife in alimony. In the alimony order, the trial court miscalculated the income generated by an apartment complex. We affirm in part and remand in part for consideration as to whether this affects the amount of alimony awarded to the wife.

Read More »