Kiell v. Kiell The record shows that the increase in the value of two life insurance policies was approximately twice the amount of the premiums paid during the post-separation period. Policy statements from the insurer clarify that approximately half the increase in the policies’ values during this period was from interest and dividends. The arbitrator erred in finding that there was no passive post-separation appreciation in the value of the life insurance policies.
Tagged with: Arbitration Domestic Relations equitable distribution life insurance
Read More »