Free Newsletter
Collision results in $7.1M settlement for worker
A collision that resulted in injuries to an employee of a waste management company has resulted in a $7.1 million settlement for the worker. On June 16, 2020, an employee of a waste management company was standing on the driver side riding step of a garbage truck while it made stops to collect trash. The garbage […]
Distracted driving leads to collision, $1.25M settlement
A homeless man struck from behind while riding his bicycle, allegedly by a driver distracted by his ice cream sandwich, has agreed to a pretrial settlement totaling $1.25 million, his attorneys report. Michael Levine of the Levine Law Group in Mooresville said in a statement that the man, Norman Kelly, was heading “home” — to […]
Top Legal News
- O’Connor paved way for women on high court
- New laws toughen penalties for rioting, power station attacks
- Judge dismisses environmental racism lawsuit
- Former US ambassador arrested in counterintelligence probe
- O’Connor, first woman on US Supreme Court, has died at 93
- Judicial activists subpoena vote splits Judiciary Committee
- Judges block GOP’s election board changes
- Federal judge blocks first TikTok app ban
- Wisconsin unions sue to reverse bargaining limits
- Justices seem doubtful of SEC’s authority
- $120M judgment entered against failed dam’s owner
- Minneapolis stores where Floyd was killed sue city
Commentary
- Name game can end up being blame game
- Stericycle decision forces evaluation of policies, practices
- Are workplace DEI policies still legal after SCOTUS decisions?
- N.C. justices to decide many interesting cases
- Amotion sees resurgence after almost a decade
- The flip side of generative AI in law and how to address it
- The fight for equal educational opportunity continues
- Court’s term was rough on big business
- Ex-president, bar association have made their choice
- Ruling sharpens boundaries in attorney-client privilege
- Lawyers Weekly debuts new and improved web experience
- US Supreme Court bites back at parody’s use of the First Amendment
