Bayer CropScience LP v. Chemtura Corp. Where the parties operated under their contract for nearly four years before defendant decided to terminate the contract on April 30, 2012, enforcement of the status quo would be the parties’ continued operation under the contract. Therefore, plaintiff seeks a prohibitory, rather than a mandatory, injunction.
Escarraman v. Northwoods at Coulwood Homeowners Association, Inc. Where there was an actual agreement between the defendants covering the crossclaim at issue, defendant Landmark Capital LLC could not recover on its quasi contract unjust enrichment crossclaim.
Contract – Arbitration – Securities Broker – ‘Associated Person’ – Financial Advisor – Ponzi Schemes
Waterford Investment Services Inc. v. Bosco Although a financial advisor who allegedly operated Ponzi schemes had changed brokers before plaintiff investors filed their FINRA arbitration claim, the current broker must arbitrate the claim because the advisor was an “associated person,” the 4th Circuit says.
Lee v. Coastal Agrobusiness, Inc. The plaintiff-farmers seek a set-off with respect to defendant INTX Microbials, the manufacturer of the inoculant that allegedly ruined the farmers’ peanut crop. Since the price of the inoculant only accounted for $6,425.70 of the farmers’ $171,921.48 unpaid account with defendant Coastal Agrobusiness, Coastal is entitled to summary judgment in the am[...]
Williams v. O’Charley’s, Inc.
Contract – Burial Plot Purchase – Resale to Another – Civil Practice – Statute of Limitations – Tort/Negligence
Hardin v. York Memorial Park In 1993, when her husband died, plaintiffs’ decedent bought three burial plots from defendants — one for her husband, one for herself, and one for another family member. Where defendants resold one of the plots to a stranger in 1993, and where plaintiffs originally filed suit on Nov. 9, 2006, their breach of contract claim as to that plot is time-barred. H[...]
U.S. ex rel. Jon H. Oberg v. Kentucky Higher Educ. Student Loan Corp. A district court did not use the correct test when analyzing whether student loan corporations formed by four different states may be sued in a qui tam action alleging they defrauded the U.S. Department of Education; the 4th Circuit vacates a lower court’s dismissal of the suit on the ground that the corporations were[...]
Epes v. B.E. Waterhouse, LLC Where both the lease assignment and plaintiff’s guaranty reflect that the assignment would not release plaintiff from liability as guarantor, the trial court correctly granted summary judgment to the defendant-landlords on plaintiff’s request for a declaratory judgment that plaintiff “has no ongoing duties, obligations, or liability of any type to defend[...]
Contract – Hospital Services – Reasonable Charges – Civil Practice – Summary Judgment – Employees’ Affidavits
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority v. Talford In support of its claim that the defendant-patient owed it $14,419.57 for a four-day hospitalization, the plaintiff-hospital submitted the affidavits of its Manager of Patient Financial Services, Legal Accounts and its Director, Revenue Management. These affidavits were minimally sufficient to satisfy the hospital’s burden of proof as [...]
Young & McQueen Grading Co. v. Mar-Comm & Associates, Inc. It doesn’t matter that the plaintiff-contractor dealt with two entities – Mar-Comm & Associates, Inc. (the actual property owner) and Mar-Comm & Associates of North Carolina, LLC – with regard to a construction project since Mar-Comm of NC was acting as Mar-Comm’s agent.
Contract – Fishing Tournament – Rules Violation – First Impression — Fishing License – Disqualification – Civil Practice – Venue – Judges – Recusal Motion
Topp v. Big Rock Foundation, Inc. Although the plaintiff-contestants were warned not to let the lack of a fishing license jeopardize a $1,000,000 prize, their first mate entered the contest without renewing his fishing license. Since plaintiffs failed to show that their disqualification was the result of arbitrariness, fraud or collusion, the defendant-foundation’s decision stands.
Micro Capital Investors, Inc. v. Broyhill Furniture Industries Defendant’s furniture factory and adjacent warehouse were heated by boilers that were powered by burning waste wood, a byproduct of the manufacturing process. When plaintiff bought the factory from defendant, plaintiff agreed to continue to provide heat to the adjacent warehouse, and defendant agreed to pay one-fourth of def[...]
- VIDEO: 5 Questions With … Jan E. Pritchett
- Conflicted Appeals Court affirms removal of Superior Court clerk
- NC transgender health case might go to high court
- Murdaugh pleads guilty to financial crimes
- Alabama redistricting case before Supreme Court
- Band leader: ‘Doing my job’ when arrested
- Court orders part of abortion referendum rewritten
- Lawsuit faults Google Maps in deadly crash
- Program offers new opportunities for summer associates
- Bill ties NC casinos, Medicaid expansion
- West Point sued over affirmative action in admissions
- Jury pool could boost Trump in documents case
- Amotion sees resurgence after almost a decade
- The flip side of generative AI in law and how to address it
- The fight for equal educational opportunity continues
- Court’s term was rough on big business
- Ex-president, bar association have made their choice
- Ruling sharpens boundaries in attorney-client privilege
- Lawyers Weekly debuts new and improved web experience
- US Supreme Court bites back at parody’s use of the First Amendment
- Supreme Court leaves key internet protection untouched
- Case study: North Carolina courts provide guidance on scope, limitations of attorney-client privilege
- A Different Ode to Pro Bono Work
- A roadmap to attracting, developing, retaining great associates