Where there was some evidence that the plaintiff-bicyclist, a hit-and-run victim, had been drinking and may have been swerving, and where his own doctor opined that alcohol can affect the ability to ride a bicycle in a safe manner, the trial court did not err in submitting the issues of contributory negligence and contributory gross […]
Even though a pedestrian crosswalk path would have taken plaintiff to the passenger-side door of her husband’s car, plaintiff took a shortcut across a grass median and – distracted by looking at her children and husband – did not see a storm drain whose metal grate had been removed. Plaintiff’s injuries from the fall were […]
Daisy v. Yost (Lawyers Weekly No. 011-389-16, 7 pp.) (Chris Dillon, J.) Appealed from Guilford County Superior Court (Eric Morgan, J.) N.C. App. Holding: Defendant’s left-turn arrow was solid red and plaintiff’s light facing the opposite direction was yellow when plaintiff drove (at the speed limit) straight through the intersection and defendant made her turn, […]
Holding: Contrary to defendant’s argument, plaintiff was not required to try to make it across an intersection when he saw and heard a fire truck on its way into the intersection; plaintiff was not contributorily negligent when he stopped in compliance with G.S. § 20-156(b).
Tort/Negligence — Gross Contributory Negligence – Directed Verdict – Alcohol Consumption – Jury Question
McCauley v. Thomas (Lawyers Weekly No. 15-07-0664, 20 pp.) (Douglas McCullough, J.) Appealed from Lee County Superior Court (Thomas Lock, J.) N.C. App. Holding: Although plaintiff admitted that she had consumed enough alcohol to feel the effects and that defendant had consumed more drinks than she, plaintiff also testified that defendant did not appear to […]
In re New Bern Riverfront Development, LLC (Weaver Cooke Construction, LLC v. J. Davis Architects, PLLC) (Lawyers Weekly No. 14-05-0838, 25 pp. (Stephani Humrickhouse, J.) 10-00023-8; E.B.N.C. Holding: The indemnity provision in the contract between the third-party plaintiff-general contractor and the third-party defendant-subcontractor would require the subcontractor to indemnify the general cont[...]
Tort/Negligence – Contributory Negligence – Civil Practice – Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition – Other Evidence
Severn Peanut Co. v. Industrial Fumigant Co. : Even though the corporate representatives who appeared at plaintiffs’ Rule 30(b)(6) depositions testified that they were unaware of any facts to support defendants’ allegations that plaintiff Severn was contributorily negligent, there are other facts in the record which raise issues of material fact as to plaintiff Severn’s contributo[...]
Parker v. Farlow Although there is some evidence that plaintiff did not activate her turn signal for the required 100 feet and that she failed to notice the “exit only” signs at the Biscuitville driveway until she had already begun to make the turn, this evidence only raises a genuine issue as to whether plaintiff was contributorily negligent when defendant rear-ended her.
Estate of Erik Dominic Williams v. Pasquotank Cnty. Parks & Recreation Dep’t Determining whether a governmental body is entitled to immunity does not turn solely or predominantly on the fact that the services defendants provided could also be provided by nongovernmental entities.
Thorpe v. TJM Ocean Isle Partners LLC Plaintiffs’ decedent was working at a marina when he was killed, and admiralty law claims are subject to the defense of comparative negligence rather than contributory negligence. Nevertheless, since plaintiffs allege that defendants violated non-maritime duties imposed by N.C. law, plaintiffs cannot bring a wrongful death claim based in admiralty a[...]
Stephenson v. Time Warner Cable Inc. Even though the defendant-utility companies’ cables should have been buried, plaintiff knew they were on the ground, she had experience walking through them, and she did so anyway. Plaintiff’s trip and fall was the result of contributory negligence. We affirm summary judgment for defendants.
Tort/Negligence – Personal Injury – Drunk Driver’s Passenger – Contributory Negligence – Evidence – Cocaine Use – Expert Witness Qualifications
Thornton v. Stuckey Since there was a question as to whether plaintiff was contributorily negligent by riding with the defendant-drunk driver, evidence of plaintiff’s cocaine use was relevant.
- JPMorgan to pay $75M on Epstein trafficking claim
- Hunter Biden sues Giuliani over computer data access
- Technology and legal education
- NC Medicaid expansion launches Dec. 1
- Whistleblowers want court to continue Paxton lawsuit
- Attorneys: First Amendment protects Trump in ‘insurrection’ cases
- Cooper allows budget to become law; Medicaid will expand
- Alabama fraternity faces hazing lawsuit
- Judge handling Trump case faces tremendous pressure
- VIDEO: 5 Questions With … Jan E. Pritchett
- Conflicted Appeals Court affirms removal of Superior Court clerk
- NC transgender health case might go to high court
- Amotion sees resurgence after almost a decade
- The flip side of generative AI in law and how to address it
- The fight for equal educational opportunity continues
- Court’s term was rough on big business
- Ex-president, bar association have made their choice
- Ruling sharpens boundaries in attorney-client privilege
- Lawyers Weekly debuts new and improved web experience
- US Supreme Court bites back at parody’s use of the First Amendment
- Supreme Court leaves key internet protection untouched
- Case study: North Carolina courts provide guidance on scope, limitations of attorney-client privilege
- A Different Ode to Pro Bono Work
- A roadmap to attracting, developing, retaining great associates