Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Tag Archives: Medical Testimony

Workers’ Compensation – Medical Evidence – Equivocal Testimony – Back Injury

Ferguson v. Richard Childress Racing Enterprises Where plaintiff’s doctors did not fully understand his medical history and could not speak conclusively to causation, the Industrial Commission did not err in determining that the medical testimony was merely “speculation and conjecture.” We affirm the Commission’s denial of benefits for plaintiff’s back condition.

Read More »

Workers’ Compensation – Causation – Preexisting Condition – Aggravation – Twisted Ankle – Medical Testimony

Briggs v. University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill Dr. Singh testified that, if plaintiff injured his ankle on May 2, 2007 and if the pain from that injury worsened from that date onward, then he believed the May 2, 2007 incident aggravated plaintiff’s preexisting osteochondral defect. Dr. Singh’s testimony was not speculative but contingent. Where the Industrial Commission made unchallenged findings both that plaintiff sustained the May 2, 2007 ankle injury and that plaintiff’s ankle pain “progressively became worse” thereafter, these findings and Dr. Singh’s testimony support the Commission’s conclusion that plaintiff suffered a compensable aggravation of a preexisting condition.

Read More »

Workers’ Compensation Causation – Credibility – Neck Pain – Medical Testimony

Clark v. Pepsi Bottling Ventures Plaintiff told his supervisor he was not injured on the job, and where plaintiff was not consistent about the date of the onset of his neck pain. There is competent evidence to support the Industrial Commission’s finding that plaintiff’s assertion that he sustained an on-the-job injury is not credible.

Read More »

Workers’ Compensation – Casuation – Back Injury – Recurrence – Medical Testimony

Alawar v. Courtyard Marriott North Dr. Shehzad Choudry expressed his opinion to a reasonable degree of medical certainty that plaintiff’s current need for surgery is related to the back injury he suffered while working for the defendant-employer in 2003. Dr. Leonard Nelson also opined that plaintiff’s current condition is a “natural consequence” of his original injury. The fact that the doctors also gave conflicting testimony that lessened their certainty concerning the cause of plaintiff’s current condition goes to the weight of their testimony, but it does not preclude consideration of the testimony altogether.

Read More »

Workers’ Compensation – Neck & Back Injury – Credibility – Bus Driver – Minor Collision – Medical Testimony

Garner v. Capital Area Transit. The plaintiff-bus driver's only medical evidence came from a doctor who relied on plaintiff's version of the collision of two buses, one of which rolled a few feet back and bumped plaintiff's stationary bus. Plaintiff's version of the accident . . .

Read More »