Attorneys – Tort/Negligence – Legal Malpractice – Standard of Care – Bankruptcy – Damages
Miller v. Orcutt The standard of care for a bankruptcy attorney is the same in the Western District of North Carolina as it is in the Eastern District of North Carolina; therefore, the plaintiff-clients could present the testimony of a bankruptcy attorney from the Western District to establish the standard of care in a legal malpractice case against a bankruptcy attorney in the Eastern Di[...]
Tort/Negligence – Medical Malpractice – Standard of Care – Proximate Cause – Civil Practice – Directed Verdict
Day v. Brant Even though plaintiffs’ proximate cause expert agreed on cross-examination that assigning percentages to a patient’s survival changes was “speculation”, the expert’s testimony as a whole was sufficient to get to the jury on the issue of proximate cause. We reverse the trial court’s grant of a directed verdict for defendants.
Tort/Negligence – Medical Malpractice – Standard of Care – Expert Witness – Complicated Procedure
Crocker v. Roethling An obstetrician from a large hospital in a large metropolitan area of Arizona was properly rejected as an expert witness when he would have testified that the defendant-doctor — in a much smaller hospital — should have performed a complicated procedure, which the witness had never performed himself nor seen performed. We affirm summary judgment for defendant.
Unhappy client wins million-dollar judgment against his lawyer
When Jack Tuttle bought a tree-mulching machine for his land-clearing business in 2005, and had nothing but problems with it, he sought to return the machine and get his $300,000 back. He tried negotiating with the company, South Carolina-based Gyro-Trac, but to no avail, so he hired Charleston attorney Robert Lowe to help him. Three years later and on the eve of trial, Tuttle was still out hi[...]
Attorneys – Tort/Negligence – Legal Malpractice – Standard of Care – Statute of Limitations – Damages
Chase Development Group v. Fisher, Clinard & Cornwell, PLLC. (Lawyers Weekly No. 11-07-0395, 22 pp.) (Sanford L. Steelman Jr., J.) Appealed from Guilford County Superior Court (Catherine C. Eagles, J.). N.C. App. Click here for the full text of the opinion. Holding: Even though the defendant-law firm contends that the last act that could have […]
Tort/Negligence – Summary Judgment – Causation – Respondeat Superior – Nursing Staff – Standard of Care
Perry v. Presbyterian Hospital. (Lawyers Weekly No. 11-07-0015, 15 pp.) (Rick Elmore, J.) Appealed from Mecklenburg County Superior Court (Richard D. Boner, J.) N.C. App. Click here for the full text of the opinion. Holding: Even if a plaintiff is unable to establish that a physician was an agent of the defendant-hospital when there is […]
Attorneys – Tort/Negligence – Legal Malpractice Claim – Standard of Care – Ethics Professor – Professional Conduct Rules – Breach of Fiduciary Duty – Interference With Prospective Economic Advantage
Inland American Winston Hotels, Inc. v. Winston. An ethics professor who has no experience in commercial real estate and who has never been licensed to practice in North Carolina is not qualified to testify as to the standard of care applicable to the . . .
Tort/Negligence – Medical Malpractice – Standard of Care – Proximate Cause – Civil Practice – Directed Verdict
Day v. Brant. (Lawyers Weekly No. 10-07-0662, 27 pp.) (Martha A. Geer, J.) Appealed from Iredell County Superior Court. (Chris M. Collier, J.) N.C. App. Holding: Even though plaintiffs’ proximate cause expert agreed on cross-examination that assigning percentages to a patient’s survival changes was “speculation”, the expert’s testimony as a whole was sufficient to get[...]
Top Legal News
- N.C. Paralegal updates September 2023
- Trump’s post prompts gag order from judge
- Retiree group sues to block voting requirements
- Court to quickly redraw Alabama districts
- Court to hear LGBTQ-based cake case
- Hunter Biden pleads not guilty to gun charges
- Details emerge on Trump era executions
- US court in Virginia resolves NC insurance case
- Post on X leads to lawsuit against Musk
- Two more bills draw vetoes by Cooper
- Police chief who led newspaper raid resigns
- May trial date set for indicted senator
Commentary
- Amotion sees resurgence after almost a decade
- The flip side of generative AI in law and how to address it
- The fight for equal educational opportunity continues
- Court’s term was rough on big business
- Ex-president, bar association have made their choice
- Ruling sharpens boundaries in attorney-client privilege
- Lawyers Weekly debuts new and improved web experience
- US Supreme Court bites back at parody’s use of the First Amendment
- Supreme Court leaves key internet protection untouched
- Case study: North Carolina courts provide guidance on scope, limitations of attorney-client privilege
- A Different Ode to Pro Bono Work
- A roadmap to attracting, developing, retaining great associates