COA calculates UIM coverage where multiple underinsured tortfeasors, policies
The proper calculation of underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in a case involving both multiple underinsured tortfeasors and multiple UIM insurance policies is the difference between the total amount paid under all exhausted liability policies and the total limits of all applicable UIM policies, a unanimous panel of the North Carolina Court of Appeals has ruled […]
Supreme Court hits brakes on UIM precedent
Drivers who’ve been hurt in a car accident may now hit a roadblock to “stacking” the full value of their underinsured motorist policies on top of any recovery they receive from the at-fault driver, after the North Carolina Supreme Court declined to follow a rule laid down by the state’s Court of Appeals more than […]
At-fault drivers get no credit for UIM payout
The insurer for a driver who caused a collision in Davidson County won’t be able to use the injured plaintiff’s underinsured motorist coverage to reduce the amount of the judgment owed to the plaintiff, the North Carolina Supreme Court has ruled in a case of first impression that figures to have significant ramifications for the […]
Insurance – Auto – UIM – Setoff – Multiple Policies – ‘Excess Coverage’
Where (1) defendant William Creed fell asleep at the wheel of passenger/plaintiff Theodore Creed’s car, crashed into a tree, and caused serious injuries to Theodore; (2) William’s two liability policies each paid $100,000 to Theodore; and (3) defendant Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Co. tendered $100,000 to Theodore in liability coverage under one of Theodore’s […]
Insurance – Auto – UIM – Civil Practice – Statute of Limitation – Subrogation
Holding: We reverse the Court of Appeals’ ruling for the reasons stated in Judge Tyson’s dissent (Plaintiff’s declaratory judgment action and claim for recovery of proceeds received by defendants from a second motorist, Brandon Robinson, could not and did not accrue until plaintiff received notice of defendants’ negotiations with and payment by Robinson, and defendants’ […]
UIM carrier can’t seek contribution
An auto insurer that had to pay on an underinsured motorist policy after a policyholder was hit by a drunken driver cannot seek contribution from the party hosts that allegedly served the drinks that rendered the driver intoxicated, the North Carolina Court of Appeals has ruled. George Olsen was walking along the side of the […]
Insurance – Auto – UIM – First Impression – Judgments – Setoff – Subrogation Waiver
Hairston v. Harward (Lawyers Weekly No. 011-331-17, 20 pp.) (Donna Stroud, J.) (Robert Hunter Jr., J., dissenting) Appealed from Davidson County Superior Court (Joseph Crosswhite, J.) N.C. App. Holding: After a $263,000 jury verdict in plaintiff’s favor, plaintiff’s underinsured motorist carrier paid plaintiff $145,000 and abandoned its right to subrogation. Under these circumstances, defendan[...]
Insurance – Auto – UIM Coverage – Civil Practice – Declaratory Judgment Action – Burden of Proof – Policy
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Phillips (Lawyers Weekly No. 012-091-17, 9 pp.) (Donna Stroud, J.) Appealed from Onslow County Superior Court (Benjamin Alford, J.) N.C. App. Unpub. Holding: Even though the plaintiff-insurance company filed this declaratory judgment action, since defendant contended that he was covered under the policy that plaintiff issued to defendant’s […]
Insurance – Auto – UIM – Per Accident/Per Person Limit
Integon National Insurance Co. v. King (Lawyers Weekly No. 012-005-17, 12 pp.) (Robert Hunter Jr., J.) Appealed from Forsyth County Superior Court (R. Stuart Albright, J.) N.C. App. Unpub. Holding: After an accident that injured five people, the tortfeasor’s insurer paid its liability limits on a per-accident basis. Therefore, an injured motorcycle driver’s underinsured motorist […]
Insurance – Auto – UIM – Civil Practice – Statute of Limitation – Subrogation
North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. Hull (Lawyers Weekly No. 011-009-17, 37 pp.) (Wendy Enochs, J.) (John Tyson, J., concurring in part & dissenting in part) Appealed from Davidson County Superior Court (Mark Klass, J.) N.C. App. Holding: After being injured in a multi-car accident, defendants accepted the liability limits from an underinsured […]
Insurance – Auto – UIM – California Policy – No Stacking
Foster v. Wilet (Lawyers Weekly No. 004-021-16, 6 pp.) (Max Cogburn Jr., J.) 3:15-cv-00397; W.D.N.C. Holding: Both California law (where plaintiff received his auto insurance policy) and the policy itself are clear: since plaintiff’s coverage was for $100,000 and since plaintiff has received a total of $100,000 from the two drivers involved in the accident […]
Insurance – Auto – UIM – Coverage Caps – Individual & Accident
Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Gosnell (Lawyers Weekly No. 002-018-16, 9 pp.) (James Dever III, C.J.) 5:15-cv-00071; E.D.N.C. Holding: Where (1) a tortfeasor caused an accident that injured the three defendants; (2) the tortfeasor’s liability limits with Allstate Insurance Co. were $100,000 per person and $300,000 per accident; (3) Allstate paid each defendant […]
Top Legal News
- Hunter Biden pleads not guilty to gun charges
- Details emerge on Trump era executions
- US court in Virginia resolves NC insurance case
- Post on X leads to lawsuit against Musk
- Two more bills draw vetoes by Cooper
- Police chief who led newspaper raid resigns
- May trial date set for indicted senator
- Insurance appeal dismissed after intervening settlement
- Supreme Court opens new term today
- Judge blocks 2 provisions in NC abortion law
- Connecticut tightens laws on gun control
- Garland says he’d resign if asked to target Trump
Commentary
- Amotion sees resurgence after almost a decade
- The flip side of generative AI in law and how to address it
- The fight for equal educational opportunity continues
- Court’s term was rough on big business
- Ex-president, bar association have made their choice
- Ruling sharpens boundaries in attorney-client privilege
- Lawyers Weekly debuts new and improved web experience
- US Supreme Court bites back at parody’s use of the First Amendment
- Supreme Court leaves key internet protection untouched
- Case study: North Carolina courts provide guidance on scope, limitations of attorney-client privilege
- A Different Ode to Pro Bono Work
- A roadmap to attracting, developing, retaining great associates