Pantyhose: It’s (still) what to wear
Amber Nimocks//October 11, 2012//
When the results of a LinkedIn survey regarding outdated office equipment and practices pinged around the internet last week, we at Sidebar quickly zeroed in on the most crucial item: 27 percent of 7,000 respondents predicted that formal business attire like suits, ties and pantyhose are likely to vanish from offices in the next five years.
Of course we noted the other results – that the majority of respondents believe the end is nigh for tape recorders (79 percent), fax machines (71 percent) and standard working hours (57 percent). But no more pantyhose? Could it be true?
Signs point to “no.” Female lawyers in the North Carolina, don’t toss out your stockings with the Rolodex (also voted on the wane by 58 percent of survey takers).

For help divining the direction of legwear, we consulted attorney Susan Scafidi, a professor at Fordham School of Law and founder and director of the nonprofit Fashion Law Institute. Scafidi says we are witnessing a generational shift that offers us a new set of stylish but formal choices.
She writes: “Sheer, skin-toned pantyhose have been on the run for the better part of a decade, and in particular since Michele Obama began flashing bare legs on the campaign trail during the last presidential election. That being said, courtroom styles in particular are slow to change — judges are still wearing medieval scholars’ robes, after all. And despite the fact that trousers are standard office attire, many women prefer dresses and skirts as style statements or for formal settings, so simply skirting the question with tailored pantsuits isn’t a satisfactory solution.
“But there is a via media. Rather than dare to go bare, especially in cold weather, leading lady litigators can instead slip on fashionable legwear options like nude fishnets or opaque tights matched to shoes or suits.”
We should make clear that Scafidi understands that North Carolina is not New York. She earned her undergrad degree from Duke and clerked in Little Rock, Ark. Nude fishnets, in the right shade, she says, are more subtle than you’d think.
Does the mere thought get your knickers in a twist? Answer our pantyhose poll below or Tweet to @NCLWTechTalk.
When it comes to pantyhose, lawyers should:
- Trade them for bare legs in the heat of summer. (39%, 18 Votes)
- Wear them year-round in office settings and in court. (33%, 15 Votes)
- Burn them in protest on the courthouse steps. (20%, 9 Votes)
- Wear them, but only if they are nude fishnets. (9%, 4 Votes)
Total Voters: 46
Legal Tech
- AI in practice: How new technology is affecting litigation practice
- Experts foresee legal malpractice risk for those who eschew AI
- Legal Decoder launches AI-powered billing analytics interface
Top Legal News
- EBay, former execs to pay $56M to settle couple’s harassment case
- ‘Don’t threaten our first responders’: Jackson sues FEMA again over withheld public safety funds
- 10 business development mistakes you can’t afford to make
- Meta disregarded its own research on teen harm, Tennessee tells jury
- Reputational management: Making your public statements as impactful and effective as possible
- 5 Questions: From briefs to bestsellers
- Wake County shutting down online arrest records portal over expungement concerns
Commentary
- Legally Speaking: How communication failures turn disputes into lawsuits
- We tore out our own backup generator
- When is a PIP an adverse employment action?
- Legally Speaking: What spring can teach us about active listening
- A useful patent management government notice
- Opinion: NC judges have enormous power. Be sure to vote in November
- The third option: Why your best employees are quietly losing their edge
- AI divorce is real, but family law can still save itself




