Domestic Relations – Equitable Distribution – Distributive Award – Interest Rate – Ability to Pay – 15-Year Payment Period
Teresa Bruno, Opinions Editor//March 22, 2017//
Porter v. Porter (Lawyers Weekly No. 011-085-17, 29 pp.) (Donna Stroud, J.) Appealed from New Hanover County District Court (Melinda Crouch, J.) N.C. App.
Holding: Although the parties agreed that the plaintiff-husband would be unable to pay the $348,050 distributive award immediately or even within six years, when the trial court set out a 15-year payment schedule, the court should have made it clear (1) that the husband would be allowed to pre-pay the balance if he could, (2) why the court chose an eight-percent interest rate, and (3) whether the husband had the ability to make the payments ordered.
We affirm the equitable distribution order in part, reverse in part, and remand.
Even though the husband’s initial investment in Rugworks, LLC, was $50,000 of his separate property, since he worked at Rugworks full time during the parties’ marriage, and since he presented no evidence of any passive appreciation of Rugworks, the trial court did not err in classifying the husband’s interest in Rugworks – less $50,000 – as marital property.
Legal Tech
- AI in practice: How new technology is affecting litigation practice
- Experts foresee legal malpractice risk for those who eschew AI
- Legal Decoder launches AI-powered billing analytics interface
Top Legal News
- Raleigh ed-tech company pays six figures to resolve EEOC disability discrimination charge
- EBay, former execs to pay $56M to settle couple’s harassment case
- ‘Don’t threaten our first responders’: Jackson sues FEMA again over withheld public safety funds
- 10 business development mistakes you can’t afford to make
- Meta disregarded its own research on teen harm, Tennessee tells jury
- Reputational management: Making your public statements as impactful and effective as possible
- 5 Questions: From briefs to bestsellers
Commentary
- Legally Speaking: How communication failures turn disputes into lawsuits
- We tore out our own backup generator
- When is a PIP an adverse employment action?
- Legally Speaking: What spring can teach us about active listening
- A useful patent management government notice
- Opinion: NC judges have enormous power. Be sure to vote in November
- The third option: Why your best employees are quietly losing their edge
- AI divorce is real, but family law can still save itself




