Appeals court won’t block ruling on candidate party label
The Associated Press//August 28, 2018//
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — North Carolina Republicans have been dealt another setback in their efforts to remove a state Supreme Court candidate’s party affiliation from the ballot.
The state Court of Appeals declined Monday to hear the request of GOP legislative leaders to block a lower court’s order that candidate Chris Anglin be listed as a Republican on the November ballot.
A trial court judge this month halted enforcement of a new law removing party designations next to the names of Anglin and a few other judicial candidates because they had switched their affiliation too close to filing.
Anglin was a registered Democrat until three weeks before he filed to run. He says the law unfairly targeted him.
The state Supreme Court could still step in, but time is dwindling before ballots must be printed.
Legal Tech
- AI in practice: How new technology is affecting litigation practice
- Experts foresee legal malpractice risk for those who eschew AI
- Legal Decoder launches AI-powered billing analytics interface
Top Legal News
- 5 Questions: From briefs to bestsellers
- Wake County shutting down online arrest records portal over expungement concerns
- NC Biz Court: Fiduciary duty claims stand in healthcare company dispute
- US appeals court rules Trump cannot implement mail-in voting order
- Biz Court: Firing an owner doesn’t end membership or voting rights
- Michigan couple sues Taylor Farms, Taco Bell after getting cyclosporiasis
- US judge casts doubt on 69,000 cases alleging J&J talc caused cancer
Commentary
- Legally Speaking: How communication failures turn disputes into lawsuits
- We tore out our own backup generator
- When is a PIP an adverse employment action?
- Legally Speaking: What spring can teach us about active listening
- A useful patent management government notice
- Opinion: NC judges have enormous power. Be sure to vote in November
- The third option: Why your best employees are quietly losing their edge
- AI divorce is real, but family law can still save itself










