Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Practice — Subject Matter Jurisdiction – Indictment Allegations – Obstruction of Justice

Criminal Practice — Subject Matter Jurisdiction – Indictment Allegations – Obstruction of Justice

Listen to this article

Although the caption of defendant’s indictment included the words “obstruction of justice,” this was insufficient to correct the indictment’s omission of an essential element: that defendant obstructed, prevented, impeded, or hindered justice.

We vacate the judgment against defendant and remand for a new disposition.

Defendant’s Alford plea did not waive his right to appeal. A defendant may challenge the sufficiency of the indictment despite having knowingly and voluntarily pled guilty to the charge.

But where defendant has elected to repudiate a portion of his plea agreement, we must vacate the entire underlying plea agreement and remand for a new disposition.

State v. Acklin (Lawyers Weekly No. 012-017-22, 7 pp.) (Jefferson Griffin, J.) Appealed from Pitt County Superior Court (Jeffery Foster, J.) Caden William Hayes for the state; Wyatt Orsbon for defendant. 2022-NCCOA-16


Top Legal News

See All Top Legal News

Commentary

See All Commentary