NC Supreme Court says escalating parental conflict can justify custody change
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff//September 16, 2025//
HIGHLIGHTS
- NC Supreme Court reinstates modified custody order in Durbin v. Durbin
- Court rules escalating parental conflict posing harm is substantial change in circumstances
- Father’s failure to manage child’s medical needs cited in ruling
- Justices defer to trial court’s credibility findings and best interests determination
The North Carolina Supreme Court held that escalating conflict between parents that poses a risk of harm to a child constitutes a substantial change in circumstances warranting modification of an existing custody order. The decision reverses the Court of Appeals and reinstates the trial court’s modified custody order.
The 25-page opinion is Durbin v. Durbin.
The case arose after the trial court found that the father had failed to attend to his son’s medical needs, including asthma treatment, which resulted in missed medication doses and additional medical care. The court also found an increasing pattern of conflict and the father’s refusal to reasonably communicate with the mother or the parenting coordinator. The trial court concluded these circumstances adversely affected the child’s health and were not in the child’s best interests.
On appeal, the Court of Appeals held that the evidence did not show a substantial change in circumstances. The Supreme Court disagreed, emphasizing that while conflict is often present in custody matters, escalating conflict that risks harm to the child is a sufficient change. The Court explained that a parent’s unwillingness or inability to communicate reasonably about the child’s health, education, and welfare can justify modifying custody.
The justices further deferred to the trial court’s unique position to evaluate witness credibility and the overall impact of the parents’ behavior on the children. Because the trial court determined the modified custody arrangement served the children’s best interests, the Supreme Court found no abuse of discretion.
EXTERNAL LINKS
Related Articles
Top Legal News
- Judge dismisses suit accusing Zillow of kickback, racketeering schemes
- Settlement agreement did not terminate LLC membership
- Settlement may have mooted insurer’s coverage dispute
- Raleigh ed-tech company pays six figures to resolve EEOC disability discrimination charge
- EBay, former execs to pay $56M to settle couple’s harassment case
- ‘Don’t threaten our first responders’: Jackson sues FEMA again over withheld public safety funds
- 10 business development mistakes you can’t afford to make
Legal Tech
- AI in practice: How new technology is affecting litigation practice
- Experts foresee legal malpractice risk for those who eschew AI
- Legal Decoder launches AI-powered billing analytics interface
Commentary
- Legally Speaking: How communication failures turn disputes into lawsuits
- We tore out our own backup generator
- When is a PIP an adverse employment action?
- Legally Speaking: What spring can teach us about active listening
- A useful patent management government notice
- Opinion: NC judges have enormous power. Be sure to vote in November
- The third option: Why your best employees are quietly losing their edge
- AI divorce is real, but family law can still save itself




