NC Appeals Court vacates juvenile custody order
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff//September 25, 2025//
SUMMARY
- NC Court of Appeals ruled trial court retained jurisdiction over delinquent juvenile custody case
- CCDSS argued jurisdiction ended with disposition order, but panel disagreed
- Court found missing statutory finding on juvenile’s best interest required correction
- Case vacated and remanded for trial court to add required finding
The North Carolina Court of Appeals ruled that a trial court had subject matter jurisdiction to order the Cumberland County Department of Social Services (CCDSS) to maintain custody of a delinquent juvenile. The panel emphasized that jurisdiction continues until the court expressly terminates it or the juvenile reaches age 18.
The seven-page opinion is In the Matter of D.H.
CCDSS had appealed a disposition order that continued custody, arguing the trial court lost jurisdiction once it entered its disposition order and that required statutory findings were missing. The appellate court rejected the jurisdictional challenge, noting that jurisdiction begins with the filing of a juvenile petition and does not automatically end when a disposition order is entered. Here, the juvenile had not turned 18 and the trial court had not terminated jurisdiction, so the order was valid.
The court also found that the trial court’s findings largely complied with statutory requirements for a Level 1 Disposition, which allows custody to remain with DSS. However, the disposition order failed to include a specific finding required under section 7B-2506(1)(c) that remaining in the home would be contrary to the juvenile’s best interest. That omission required correction.
Although a similar finding appeared in a separate nonsecure custody order, the Court of Appeals held that it must also be expressly included in the disposition order itself. The panel therefore vacated and remanded the case for the trial court to add the missing statutory finding.
EXTERNAL LINKS
Related Articles
Top Legal News
- Oklahoma court tosses conviction of YouTuber who went to prison for online rant
- DNA fight grows as civil suit advances in SC Murdaugh retrial
- COA reverses denial of special use permit for addiction recovery facility
- Bulldozer operator settles after losing leg in job site incident
- New York sues Kalshi, says its prediction markets are illegal gambling
- Fiduciary duty claims survive while standalone specific performance claim dismissed
- Judge dismisses suit accusing Zillow of kickback, racketeering schemes
Legal Tech
- AI is reshaping family law practice, but attorneys worry about DIY research
- Massachusetts court rejects work product protection for AI documents by girlfriend
- Exterro launches on-premises AI platform for digital forensics
Commentary
- Legally Speaking: How communication failures turn disputes into lawsuits
- We tore out our own backup generator
- When is a PIP an adverse employment action?
- Legally Speaking: What spring can teach us about active listening
- A useful patent management government notice
- Opinion: NC judges have enormous power. Be sure to vote in November
- The third option: Why your best employees are quietly losing their edge
- AI divorce is real, but family law can still save itself




