Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

NC Appeals Court vacates juvenile custody order

North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff//September 25, 2025//

Depositphotos.com

Depositphotos.com

NC Appeals Court vacates juvenile custody order

North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff//September 25, 2025//

Listen to this article

SUMMARY

  • NC Court of Appeals ruled trial court retained jurisdiction over delinquent case
  • CCDSS argued jurisdiction ended with , but panel disagreed
  • Court found missing statutory finding on juvenile’s best interest required correction
  • Case vacated and remanded for trial court to add required finding

 

The ruled that a trial court had subject matter jurisdiction to order the Cumberland County Department of Social Services (CCDSS) to maintain custody of a delinquent juvenile. The panel emphasized that jurisdiction continues until the court expressly terminates it or the juvenile reaches age 18.

The seven-page opinion is

CCDSS had appealed a disposition order that continued custody, arguing the trial court lost jurisdiction once it entered its disposition order and that required statutory findings were missing. The appellate court rejected the jurisdictional challenge, noting that jurisdiction begins with the filing of a juvenile petition and does not automatically end when a disposition order is entered. Here, the juvenile had not turned 18 and the trial court had not terminated jurisdiction, so the order was valid.

The court also found that the trial court’s findings largely complied with statutory requirements for a Level 1 Disposition, which allows custody to remain with DSS. However, the disposition order failed to include a specific finding required under section 7B-2506(1)(c) that remaining in the home would be contrary to the juvenile’s best interest. That omission required correction.

Although a similar finding appeared in a separate nonsecure custody order, the Court of Appeals held that it must also be expressly included in the disposition order itself. The panel therefore vacated and remanded the case for the trial court to add the missing statutory finding.

EXTERNAL LINKS

Top Legal News

See All Top Legal News

Legal Tech

See All Legal Tech News

Commentary

See All Commentary