Free Newsletter
FILE PHOTO: Andrew Left, the founder of Citron Research, speaks during the Reuters Global Investment 2019 Outlook Summit, in New York, U.S., November 12, 2018. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid/File Photo
Short seller Andrew Left to stand trial in LA over manipulation charges
Reuters//May 11, 2026//
Summary:
- Andrew Left charged with securities fraud in July 2024
- Alleged $16 million profit from misleading stock claims
- Trial to begin with jury selection in Los Angeles
High-profile short seller Andrew Left’s criminal trial will kick off in Los Angeles this week, spotlighting a contentious cohort of investors who have for years goaded public companies in the U.S. and overseas with allegations of fraud and mismanagement.
U.S. authorities charged Left in July 2024, alleging he had manipulated the stock market and defrauded investors with misleading claims about his positions in multiple companies’ shares, including Nvidia and Tesla, making at least $16 million in the process.
Jury selection is expected to begin on Monday and the trial could last weeks. The Justice Department expects to provide a number of witnesses, including retail investors, court filings show. It is unclear if Left, who denies the allegations, will testify.
Known for his sensational and colorful style, Left has, for more than a decade, been among the most prominent of a group of “short activists” who say they bet against public companies on the basis they are overvalued or engaging in outright fraud, drawing the ire of companies who have fought to curb their bets.
Left, who runs Citron Research, exploited his influence through social media and cable news appearances to tout what he said were his trades, only to quickly and secretly close out his positions to profit from short-lived price movements, the Justice Department alleges.
In return for compensation, Left also alerted hedge funds before publicizing his positions, allowing them to profit or mitigate losses, and concealed the coordination using fake invoices, according to prosecutors.
Left, who did not respond to an email seeking comment, pleaded not guilty and could face 25 years in prison if convicted of securities fraud. In a court filing last week, his attorneys said he “acted in good faith in making honest public commentary” and that there was no law that required him to hold his positions for a length of time.
AGGRESSIVE LEGAL THEORY?
Some legal experts have argued the case is aggressive. Long criticized, short sellers have often defended themselves by leaning on First Amendment rights. Investors are also free to change their minds.
“I think that theory standing alone would be a big swing by the DOJ,” said Drew Bradylyons, founding partner at law firm Armstrong & Bradylyons and a former federal prosecutor.
“For that reason, the government really went out of its way to allege other facts in the indictment that bolster their case. It does a good job of telling a longer story – that he knew he was making false statements to profit.”
Short sellers seek to profit off bets a stock will fall, although Left also took long positions.
Among Left’s most high-profile short targets were the now-defunct China Evergrande, GameStop, Valeant Pharmaceuticals and Shopify. Proponents of short activists say they play a crucial role in the market in exposing wrongdoing, but critics have accused them of “short and distort” tactics that have unfairly damaged public companies.
Left’s trial is the culmination of a years-long probe by criminal prosecutors in Washington and Los Angeles, who began probing short sellers in 2019, Bloomberg, Reuters and others have reported.
(Reporting by Michelle Price; Editing by Rod Nickel)
Related Articles
Related Content
Top Legal News
- AG Jackson sues federal agencies over Medicaid rule threatening coverage for cancer patients
- Supreme Court strengthens Trump’s hold on key levers of government power
- US Supreme Court takes up Pepsi ‘Mtn Dew Rise’ trademark dispute
- SCOTUS News: 4th Amendment extended to cellphone location data
- Jury consulting booms in the Carolinas
- SCOTUS News: Court rules customs agents can turn back asylum seekers
- Limited hearing ordered on counsel’s failure to use evaluation report
- As Supreme Court’s term nears its end, three major Trump rulings due
- SCOTUS News: State concealed-carry restriction violates 2nd Amendment
- File-sharing conviction qualifies as crime of child abuse under immigration law
- World court judges sue Trump administration over sanctions
Commentary
- When is a PIP an adverse employment action?
- Legally Speaking: What spring can teach us about active listening
- A useful patent management government notice
- Opinion: NC judges have enormous power. Be sure to vote in November
- The third option: Why your best employees are quietly losing their edge
- AI divorce is real, but family law can still save itself
- ‘AI won’t take your job’ and other things CEOs say before the layoffs
- When not to believe (your lyin’ eyes)
- Conduct a technology audit to improve law firm efficiency
- When the client brings ChatGPT to the consultation
- Content Marketing: Where law firms lose referrals and how to prevent it
- Your best people are not leaving for more money — they are leaving because you stopped paying attention
