Free Newsletter
FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump's motorcade drives on the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool as it undergoes renovations, with the Washington Monument and U.S. Capitol building in the background, in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 7, 2026. REUTERS/Kylie Cooper/File Photo
Lawsuit seeks to halt Trump’s makeover of Lincoln Memorial reflecting pool
Reuters//May 12, 2026//
Summary:
- Cultural Landscape Foundation files lawsuit against renovation
- Renovation alleged to violate National Historic Preservation Act
- Department of the Interior oversees reflecting pool project
A historic preservation group on May 11 filed a lawsuit seeking to halt President Donald Trump’s ongoing renovation to the Lincoln Memorial‘s reflecting pool, the latest in a string of court challenges to the former real estate developer’s efforts to remake Washington landmarks.
The lawsuit, filed by the Cultural Landscape Foundation, alleged the renovation violates the National Historic Preservation Act, a law passed by Congress in 1996 that outlines procedures for changes to historic properties.
The nonprofit seeks an emergency order halting the Trump administration‘s overhaul, which focuses on replacing the pool’s “gray stone” appearance with an industrial-strength coating in the color of a blue swimming pool.
“The dark grey, achromatic basin was not incidental to the design,” the lawsuit stated. “It was the design.”
The case was brought against the Department of the Interior, the executive agency overseeing the renovation, which said in a statement that Trump “has done more to make our nation’s capital a shining beacon than any other president in the history of this country.”
Trump announced the project last month, saying “it’s going to be fantastic” and “really beautiful.” As the project got underway, Trump’s motorcade took an unannounced trip to see the project up close.
Trump has said he was motivated to oversee the renovation after a friend visiting from Germany criticized the condition of the reflecting pool.
“He said, ‘It’s filthy, dirty. The water is disgusting-looking. It’s not representative of the country,’” Trump told reporters at a White House event last month.
Some of the president’s other projects in Washington, including renovations to the city’s golf courses and construction of a White House ballroom, have also drawn legal challenges.
A federal judge on March 31 blocked above-ground construction of Trump’s ballroom, writing that “unless and until Congress blesses this project through statutory authorization, construction has to stop!”
An appeals court later lifted the injunction, allowing construction of the ballroom to proceed while litigation continues.
(Reporting by Jan Wolfe in Washington; Editing by Matthew Lewis)
Related Articles
Related Content
Legal Tech
- How ransomware tactics against law firms are changing
- How large language models are leveling the personal injury playing field
- Attorney Share, Lawmatics integrate to automate law firm referrals
Top Legal News
- Biz Court: Firing an owner doesn’t end membership or voting rights
- Michigan couple sues Taylor Farms, Taco Bell after getting cyclosporiasis
- US judge casts doubt on 69,000 cases alleging J&J talc caused cancer
- Rockingham County asks NC Supreme Court to toss casino-related rezoning lawsuit
- Dutch judgment may provide alternate route to enforce arbitration award
- Legally Speaking: How communication failures turn disputes into lawsuits
- AG Jackson refuses to sign Duke Energy rate settlement
Commentary
- Legally Speaking: How communication failures turn disputes into lawsuits
- We tore out our own backup generator
- When is a PIP an adverse employment action?
- Legally Speaking: What spring can teach us about active listening
- A useful patent management government notice
- Opinion: NC judges have enormous power. Be sure to vote in November
- The third option: Why your best employees are quietly losing their edge
- AI divorce is real, but family law can still save itself
