NC DOT liable after pedestrian struck in Chapel Hill crosswalk
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff//May 12, 2026//
Summary:
- NC DOT breached duty by omitting Lead Pedestrian Interval
- Plaintiff awarded $850,000 plus $9,085.75 in costs
- Full commission affirmed senior deputy commissioner ruling
Action: Negligence
Injuries alleged: Orbital, nasal, lumbar spine, shoulder, pelvis, tibula, and fibula fractures and post-concussive syndrome
Case name: Huggins v. North Carolina Department of Transportation
Case no.: I.C. No. TA-30547
Judge: Senior Deputy Commissioner Robert Harris of the Industrial Commission
Amount: $850,000
Date: April 7, 2025 (Senior Deputy Commissioner Harris) and Oct. 29, 2025 (Full commission)
Attorneys: Ryan Oxendine of Oxendine & Associates and Kristen Beightol of Edwards Beightol, both in Raleigh (for the plaintiff)
A pedestrian struck by a vehicle while crossing Manning Drive at its intersection with Hibbard/Emergency Room Drive in Chapel Hill in December 2019 has been awarded $850,000 plus costs against the North Carolina Department of Transportation.
The plaintiff was crossing in a marked crosswalk after receiving the “walk” signal when she was struck by a driver turning left from Hibbard/Emergency Room Drive. The driver had received a green light simultaneously with the pedestrian walk signal — a timing configuration that, had a Lead Pedestrian Interval been in place, would have given pedestrians a three-to-five second head start before motorists received the green, making pedestrians more visible to turning drivers. No such interval was in place at the time.
Senior Deputy Commissioner Harris initially found in an April 2025 decision that NC DOT breached its duty of reasonable care by failing to implement the Lead Pedestrian Interval, that the plaintiff was not negligent and that the driver’s negligence did not supersede NC DOT’s liability. The Full Commission affirmed on October 29, 2025, with Commissioner Wanda Blanche Taylor writing that the driver’s actions were foreseeable and that the plaintiff would not have been struck but for NC DOT’s negligence. Commissioners Gillen and Goodman concurred.
NC DOT was ordered to pay $850,000 to the plaintiff plus $9,085.75 in costs to plaintiff’s counsel. NC DOT did not appeal further.
Related Articles
Legal Tech
- AI in practice: How new technology is affecting litigation practice
- Experts foresee legal malpractice risk for those who eschew AI
- Legal Decoder launches AI-powered billing analytics interface
Top Legal News
- Settlement may have mooted insurer’s coverage dispute
- Raleigh ed-tech company pays six figures to resolve EEOC disability discrimination charge
- EBay, former execs to pay $56M to settle couple’s harassment case
- ‘Don’t threaten our first responders’: Jackson sues FEMA again over withheld public safety funds
- 10 business development mistakes you can’t afford to make
- Meta disregarded its own research on teen harm, Tennessee tells jury
- Reputational management: Making your public statements as impactful and effective as possible
Commentary
- Legally Speaking: How communication failures turn disputes into lawsuits
- We tore out our own backup generator
- When is a PIP an adverse employment action?
- Legally Speaking: What spring can teach us about active listening
- A useful patent management government notice
- Opinion: NC judges have enormous power. Be sure to vote in November
- The third option: Why your best employees are quietly losing their edge
- AI divorce is real, but family law can still save itself










