Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

equitable distribution

Oct 16, 2014

Bankruptcy — Real Property – Lis Pendens – Domestic Relations – Equitable Distribution

Angell v. Faison (Lawyers Weekly No. 14-05-0971, 14 pp.) (Stephani Humrickhouse, J.) 13-00165-8; E.B.N.C. Holding: On the petition date, the chain of title for each of the real properties at issue contained a notice of lis pendens that the debtor had filed in connection with the equitable distribution proceeding between her and her ex-husband. Therefore, […]

Oct 7, 2014

Domestic Relations — Equitable Distribution – Sanctions – Notice – Timeline

Green v. Green (Lawyers Weekly No. 14-07-0936, 33 pp.) (Donna Stroud, J.) Appealed from Nash County District Court (John Covolo, J.) N.C. App. Holding: This equitable distribution action was delayed well beyond the timelines contemplated by our statutes and the applicable local rules; furthermore, there are no certificates of service on defendant as to several […]

Jun 18, 2013

Domestic Relations – Contract — Prenuptial Agreement – Civil Practice – Jurisdiction

Callanan v. Walsh In their divorce/equitable distribution case, the parties invoked the district court’s jurisdiction to decide matters related to their premarital agreement. Therefore, the superior court lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate plaintiff’s claim that defendant breached the premarital agreement.

Jan 24, 2013

Family Law – Divorce– Equitable Distribution – Motion to Dismiss

Ward v. Ward A voluntary dismissal by one party does not impede the other party from pursuing an independent equitable distribution claim.

Jan 24, 2013

Family Law – Divorce –Equitable Distribution–Separate Property – Diminution of Marital Property

Gould v. Gould Property given to one spouse by that spouse’s parents should not be included as marital property for purposes of equitable distribution.

Oct 11, 2012

Domestic Relations – Alimony – Supporting Spouse – Equitable Distribution – Unequal Division – Discovery

Rochelle v. Rochelle The defendant-husband failed to comply with the trial court’s order compelling discovery, and the husband does not challenge the following finding of fact: “Because Defendant’s cash deposits are always more than enough to cover his fluctuating monthly expenses, it can be inferred that there is additional cash elsewhere to be able to cover additional expenses, su[...]

Oct 2, 2012

Domestic Relations – Civil Practice – Subject Matter Jurisdiction — Equitable Distribution – Military Pension – CRSC Election – First Impression

Hillard v. Hillard After an equitable distribution order awarded the defendant-wife half of the plaintiff-husband’s military pension, the husband unilaterally elected to receive combat-related special compensation (CRSC) instead of his pension. Although federal law preempts state law with regard to CRSC and such payments cannot be classified as marital property subject to equitable dist[...]

Sep 18, 2012

Domestic Relations – Equitable Distribution – Unequal Division – Distributive Award – Valuation

Peltzer v. Peltzer Even though the equitable distribution order does not explicitly state what percentage of the marital estate is distributed to which party, the unchallenged findings and a little math show that the defendant-husband was awarded 55 percent of the marital estate, rather than the 20 percent he claims to have been awarded.

Sep 13, 2012

Civil Practice – Subject Matter Jurisdiction – Domestic Relations – Equitable Distribution – Corporate – Stock Redemption Agreement – Tort/Negligence

Whitworth v. Estate of Whitworth Even though plaintiff’s equitable distribution action is no longer pending, her claims that rest on allegations of intrinsic fraud must be brought in district court; however, her claims of breach of fiduciary duty, constructive fraud, and RICO violations against her daughter-in-law and the estate of her late son may be brought in superior court.

Sep 11, 2012

Domestic Relations – Equitable Distribution – Marital Debt – Credibility – Alimony – Amount & Duration

Ritchie v. Ritchie Even though the defendant-husband presented evidence that he made $94,929 in post-separation payments towards marital debts, it was within the trial court’s province to believe or disbelieve the husband’s evidence.

Sep 11, 2012

Domestic Relations – Equitable Distribution — Civil Practice – Contempt – Failure to Pay Debts – Settlement

Kinney v. Kinney A plaintiff-husband was in contempt of an order distributing marital property when he was ordered to pay certain debts in full and to hold the defendant-wife harmless on account of those debts but instead he negotiated a settlement of the debts for less than the full amount due.

Sep 10, 2012

Domestic Relations – Equitable Distribution – Classification & Valuation — Husband’s Businesses – Post-Separation Distributions – Post-Separation Diminution in Value

Binder v. Binder The trial court found that the diminution in value of one of the defendant-husband’s businesses was only “partly passive” and was partly due to the husband’s actions. These findings do not support the trial court’s conclusion that the entire diminution in value should be classified as divisible.

Top Legal News

See All Top Legal News


See All Commentary