Civil Practice — Personal Jurisdiction – General – Corporate – North Carolina Contacts – Venue – Transfer
Estate of Thompson v. Mission Essential Personnel, LLC (Lawyers Weekly No. 14-03-0929, 10 pp.) (James Beaty, J.) 1:11-cv-00547; M.D.N.C. Holding: Where defendant received less than four percent of its 2006-2011 […]
Civil Practice – Personal Jurisdiction – Virginia Transaction – Virginia & Florida Defendants
Weisman v. Blue Mountain Organics Distribution, LLC (Lawyers Weekly No. 14-15-0873, 13 pp.) (James Gale, J.) 2014 NCBC 41 Holding: Plaintiff is a North Carolina resident whose former North Carolina […]
Civil Practice – Personal Jurisdiction – Real Property – Promissory Note – General Jurisdiction – Prior Litigation
Synovus Bank v. Schaur Even though an N.C. state court found that it had personal jurisdiction over the Michigan defendant, that action was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice; therefore, the court’s finding does not have collateral estoppel effect.
Civil Practice – Personal Jurisdiction – Real Property – Promissory Note – General Jurisdiction – Prior Litigation
Synovus Bank v. Schaur Even though an N.C. state court found that it had personal jurisdiction over the Michigan defendant, that action was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice; therefore, the court’s finding does not have collateral estoppel effect. Moreover, the state court litigation involved the original promissory note between the parties whereas this action involves a renewal p[...]
Civil Practice – Personal Jurisdiction – Indian TV Network – General Jurisdiction – Insufficient Contacts – Tort/Negligence – Defamation
Danius v. Sun TV Network Ltd. The court does not have general jurisdiction over an Indian television network that contracts with a satellite subscription service and an internet-based IPTV network, which in turn provide subscription services in the U.S.
Civil Practice – Personal Jurisdiction – General Jurisdiction – Labor & Employment – Covenants Not to Compete – New Employer
Esoterix Genetic Laboratories, LLC v. McKey An out-of-state employer does not subject itself to N.C. jurisdiction simply by hiring citizens of other states who were employed by an N.C. company and who had covenants not to compete with that N.C. company. However, the defendant-company, a California corporation, does have sufficient contacts with North Carolina to give N.C. courts general j[...]
Top Legal News
- Justices revive PI claim omitted from plaintiff’s bankruptcy
- Sam Bankman-Fried loses bid to overturn crypto fraud conviction
- Environmental group failed to show irreparable harm from PFAS discharges
- Mother sues OpenAI, alleging ChatGPT encouraged daughter’s suicide
- Biz court allows franchisee’s breach of contract claims against franchisor over ad fund
- Jury awards truck driver who lost career, identity, in crushing incident
- The third option: Why your best employees are quietly losing their edge
- Sentencing enhancement vacated for lack of firearm findings
- Visa, Mastercard $38 billion swipe fee settlement wins US judge’s approval
- GOP Rep. Sarah Stevens resigns to focus on NC Supreme Court race
- Occupancy tax funds may support tourism-related public safety services
Commentary
- The third option: Why your best employees are quietly losing their edge
- AI divorce is real, but family law can still save itself
- ‘AI won’t take your job’ and other things CEOs say before the layoffs
- When not to believe (your lyin’ eyes)
- Conduct a technology audit to improve law firm efficiency
- When the client brings ChatGPT to the consultation
- Content Marketing: Where law firms lose referrals and how to prevent it
- Your best people are not leaving for more money — they are leaving because you stopped paying attention
- Best at Work Insights: The choice we’re making about AI
- New life for the noncompete
- 2026: The year of tech, both heroes and villains
- Beyond burnout: The case for workplaces where people thrive



