Free Newsletter
Michael Jordan open to NASCAR antitrust settlement amid charter fight
Michael Jordan said he is open to settling a high-stakes antitrust suit against NASCAR over its charter system as teams urge resolution.
Judge denies Jordan-owned NASCAR team injunction in charter lawsuit
A federal judge denied Michael Jordan’s 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports a preliminary injunction in their antitrust charter lawsuit against NASCAR, with trial set for Dec. 1.
Judge denies charter status for 23XI, FRM in NASCAR fight
A federal judge rejected a request by 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports to race as chartered teams while their antitrust lawsuit against NASCAR plays out.
Court deals setback to Jordan’s lawsuit against NASCAR
A federal judge on Friday denied a motion by two NASCAR teams — including one owned by basketball star Michael Jordan — to be recognized as chartered teams as they […]
Jordan, other owners take NASCAR case to court
CHARLOTTE — Retired NBA great Michael Jordan and his fellow owners of two NASCAR teams went to federal court Monday for a hearing in their antitrust fight against the stock […]
Teams suing NASCAR seek court order to continue racing
CHARLOTTE — The two teams suing NASCAR asked a judge for a preliminary injunction Wednesday so they can compete next season under the charter system they are challenging as their […]
Michael Jordan, second racing team sue NASCAR
CHARLOTTE — Two NASCAR teams — one of them owned by Michael Jordan — filed a federal antitrust lawsuit against the stock car series and its chairman, Jim France, on […]
Antitrust lawyer advises NASCAR teams on talks
DAYTONA BEACH, Fla. — NASCAR teams have hired one of the country’s top antitrust and sports lawyers to advise them in their ongoing dispute with the family-owned stock car series […]
Top Legal News
- When the client brings ChatGPT to the consultation
- Elon Musk’s trial against Sam Altman to reveal ongoing power struggle for OpenAI
- NC lawmakers plan to tap highway fund to cover DMV credit card fee shortfall, N&O reports
- Complaint dismissed where allegations of surveillance and discrimination were conclusory
- Charlotte Center for Legal Advocacy says state auditor’s IOLTA report found no misuse of funds by organization
- U.S. soldier accused of pocketing $400K through bets on Maduro’s capture
- Clinical evidence supports renewed pornography ban on supervised release
- Blockchain billionaire Sun takes Trump family’s crypto firm to court
- Legal aid of North Carolina affirms proper use of IOLTA funds in state auditor report
- Equitable mootness limited in simple Chapter 13 appeal
- Four Raleigh lobbyists indicted over Kentucky bourbon distillery trip for NC lawmakers, N&O reports
Commentary
- When the client brings ChatGPT to the consultation
- Content Marketing: Where law firms lose referrals and how to prevent it
- Your best people are not leaving for more money — they are leaving because you stopped paying attention
- Best at Work Insights: The choice we’re making about AI
- New life for the noncompete
- 2026: The year of tech, both heroes and villains
- Beyond burnout: The case for workplaces where people thrive
- The December question every leader should anticipate
- How do parent corporations deal with Workers’ Compensation?
- Best at Work Insights: Don’t Import 996: Why America Should Reject Overwork Culture
- Law ‘n History: The beer, scandal and haunted mansion of the Lemp dynasty
- Using QALY to quantify emotional distress in legal cases
