Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Civil Practice – Lay Representation – ‘Power of Attorney’ – Subject Matter Jurisdiction – Removal

Civil Practice – Lay Representation – ‘Power of Attorney’ – Subject Matter Jurisdiction – Removal

Listen to this article

Bank of America Inc. v. Campbell (Lawyers Weekly No. 12-03-0624, 10 pp.) (L. Patrick Auld, USMJ) 1:12-cv-00269; M.D.N.C.

Holding: Even though Anthony Clay Campbell purports to be defendants’ attorney-in-fact, since he is not an attorney-at-law, he is not authorized to represent defendants in court.

All documents signed by Anthony Clay Campbell are stricken, including the notice of . This case is remanded to state court.

District courts in this circuit uniformly have precluded non-attorneys from litigating matters in the name of others based on claimed authority from some form of .

It follows from the rule prohibiting lay representation that any pleadings filed through lay representation must be disregarded as a nullity. As a result, Anthony Clay Campbell’s attempt to invoke this court’s subject matter jurisdiction fails for lack of standing. This determination requires remand to state court.


Legal Tech

See All Legal Tech News

Top Legal News

See All Top Legal News

Commentary

See All Commentary