Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Civil Practice — Judgments – Supplemental Proceedings – Subject Matter Jurisdiction – Execution

Civil Practice — Judgments – Supplemental Proceedings – Subject Matter Jurisdiction – Execution

Listen to this article

After obtaining a judgment against defendant, plaintiff initiated supplemental proceedings, seeking discovery from defendant. Where there is no indication in the record that plaintiff sought issuance of a writ of execution or that any such writ was returned unsatisfied, supplemental proceedings under G.S. Chapter 1, Article 31 were not available to plaintiff. There trial court lacked statutory authority over these supplemental proceedings and, as such, lacked subject matter jurisdiction to grant any relief under Article 31.

The trial court erred in entering its order compelling defendant to respond to discovery issued pursuant to G.S.  §§ 1-351.1 and 1-351.2 and imposing sanctions on defendant for opposing discovery in supplemental proceedings. Vacated.

Milone & MacBrook, Inc. v. Corkum (Lawyers Weekly No. 011-198-21, 11 pp.) (Toy Hampson, J.) Appealed from Wake County District Court (Michael Denning, J.) Byron Saintsing and Thomas Gray for plaintiff; Donald Hunt and Kristen Atkins Lee for defendants. 2021-NCCOA-526


Top Legal News

See All Top Legal News

Commentary

See All Commentary