Resident dies after leaving memory care facility; $1 million settlement
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff//February 15, 2024//
Action: Memory care negligence
Injuries alleged: Wrongful death; pre-death pain and suffering
Case name: Withheld
Court/case no.: Withheld
Judge: Withheld
Mediator: Rene Trehy
Amount: $1 million
Special damages: $39,000 (past medical expenses)
Date: April 2, 2023
Attorney: Stephen Gugenheim of Gugenheim Law, Raleigh (for the plaintiff)
Decedent, a resident of a memory care facility, had a known history of wandering, and there was evidence (denied by the defendant) that decedent had previously eloped from the facility. Decedent eloped from the facility and was found alive the next day in a field about a quarter-mile from the facility. The decedent later died of alleged complications from exposure.
Defendant claimed that the decedent eloped through an exit door that unlocked when a fire alarm sounded. Although there were no witnesses to the elopement, there was evidence that decedent had been in an outside courtyard the morning of the elopement. There also was evidence that the decedent had previously eloped from the facility by climbing over the courtyard fence. Documents obtained in discovery from the fire department and the alarm company proved that the fire alarm at the facility frequently sounded.
The facility was operated by an individual, was not part of a larger chain, and had limited liability insurance. Plaintiff’s counsel made a policy limit demand. Defendants failed to respond to the demand or tender policy limits within the period identified in the demand. As a result, plaintiff’s counsel withdrew the demand. Defendants later paid double the policy limits to settle the case.
Legal Tech
- AI in practice: How new technology is affecting litigation practice
- Experts foresee legal malpractice risk for those who eschew AI
- Legal Decoder launches AI-powered billing analytics interface
Top Legal News
- Settlement may have mooted insurer’s coverage dispute
- Raleigh ed-tech company pays six figures to resolve EEOC disability discrimination charge
- EBay, former execs to pay $56M to settle couple’s harassment case
- ‘Don’t threaten our first responders’: Jackson sues FEMA again over withheld public safety funds
- 10 business development mistakes you can’t afford to make
- Meta disregarded its own research on teen harm, Tennessee tells jury
- Reputational management: Making your public statements as impactful and effective as possible
Commentary
- Legally Speaking: How communication failures turn disputes into lawsuits
- We tore out our own backup generator
- When is a PIP an adverse employment action?
- Legally Speaking: What spring can teach us about active listening
- A useful patent management government notice
- Opinion: NC judges have enormous power. Be sure to vote in November
- The third option: Why your best employees are quietly losing their edge
- AI divorce is real, but family law can still save itself




