Citing climate change, Carrboro sues Duke Energy
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff//December 9, 2024//
A lawsuit filed by the town of Carrboro against Duke Energy accuses the utility of worsening climate change and misleading customers, a report by the NC Newsline website says.
The suit, filed Wednesday in Orange County Superior Court, seeks millions of dollars in damages for what Carrboro officials allege is Duke Energy’s failure to reduce greenhouse gas emissions despite knowing the risks of climate change for decades.
Mayor Barbara Foushee said this is the first lawsuit in which a municipality has targeted a utility company in this manner.
“We’re bringing this lawsuit because taking care of our town, each other, and our climate is at the center of everything we do here in Carrboro,” Foushee said. “The climate crisis is causing tremendous harm to our community’s health and well-being.”
The utility said Wednesday it is reviewing the complaint.
“Duke Energy is committed to its customers and communities and will continue working with policymakers and regulators to deliver reliable and increasingly clean energy while keeping rates as low as possible,” the company said in a statement.
The lawsuit accuses Duke Energy of engaging in a “widespread campaign” to deceive the public about climate change. It cites an example from 2004, when Cinergy, a predecessor company of Duke Energy, claimed there was “an unresolved but robust debate on the ‘science’ of global warming,” despite knowing the causes and consequences of climate change.
NC Newsline’s report says Duke Energy executives have been aware of these risks for more than 50 years.
Duke Energy, based in Charlotte, is one of the larger operators of coal and natural gas power plants in the country, providing electricity to over 8 million customers in six states.
Top Legal News
- NC hemp industry rallies against bill it calls a ban in disguise
- U.S. Supreme Court won’t halt $655M judgment against Palestinians over attacks
- Oklahoma court tosses conviction of YouTuber who went to prison for online rant
- DNA fight grows as civil suit advances in SC Murdaugh retrial
- COA reverses denial of special use permit for addiction recovery facility
- Bulldozer operator settles after losing leg in job site incident
- New York sues Kalshi, says its prediction markets are illegal gambling
Legal Tech
- AI is reshaping family law practice, but attorneys worry about DIY research
- Massachusetts court rejects work product protection for AI documents by girlfriend
- Exterro launches on-premises AI platform for digital forensics
Commentary
- Legally Speaking: How communication failures turn disputes into lawsuits
- We tore out our own backup generator
- When is a PIP an adverse employment action?
- Legally Speaking: What spring can teach us about active listening
- A useful patent management government notice
- Opinion: NC judges have enormous power. Be sure to vote in November
- The third option: Why your best employees are quietly losing their edge
- AI divorce is real, but family law can still save itself









