Inmate asphyxiated in jail restraint chair; $700,000 settlement
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff//May 22, 2025//
Action: Wrongful death
Injuries alleged: Death by asphyxiation
Case name: Dean v. Campbell
Court/case no.: U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina, No. 5:22-cv-00167-KDB-DCK
Jury and/or judge: U.S. District Court Judge Kenneth D. Bell
Name of mediator: Asa Bell
Amount: $700,000
Date: Sept. 25, 2024
Most helpful experts: Dr. Jonathan Privette, Pathologist, Mecklenburg County Medical Examiner’s Office and George Hardinger, Jail Operations Expert
Attorneys: Charles W. Hinnant, III of Ted A. Greve & Associates in Charlotte (for the plaintiff) and Nicholas Acevedo and James R. Morgan, Jr. of Womble Bond Dickinson in Winston-Salem (for the defense)
This was a §1983 case against the Iredell County Sheriff’s Department stemming from an inmate’s placement in a restraint chair. The inmate was suffering from a psychiatric episode, warranting his placement in the restraint chair. However, multiple officers held the inmate down with his head between his knees for approximately 3 minutes and 15 seconds, until he asphyxiated and died.
The case proved challenging because there are no past restraint chair-related positional asphyxiation cases in the country, so it was not clear whether the rights alleged to have been violated were “clearly established” at the time of the inmate’s death. This created a significant legal issue regarding whether the subject officers were entitled to qualified immunity.
Related Articles
Legal Tech
- AI in practice: How new technology is affecting litigation practice
- Experts foresee legal malpractice risk for those who eschew AI
- Legal Decoder launches AI-powered billing analytics interface
Top Legal News
- Settlement may have mooted insurer’s coverage dispute
- Raleigh ed-tech company pays six figures to resolve EEOC disability discrimination charge
- EBay, former execs to pay $56M to settle couple’s harassment case
- ‘Don’t threaten our first responders’: Jackson sues FEMA again over withheld public safety funds
- 10 business development mistakes you can’t afford to make
- Meta disregarded its own research on teen harm, Tennessee tells jury
- Reputational management: Making your public statements as impactful and effective as possible
Commentary
- Legally Speaking: How communication failures turn disputes into lawsuits
- We tore out our own backup generator
- When is a PIP an adverse employment action?
- Legally Speaking: What spring can teach us about active listening
- A useful patent management government notice
- Opinion: NC judges have enormous power. Be sure to vote in November
- The third option: Why your best employees are quietly losing their edge
- AI divorce is real, but family law can still save itself




