$6 million mediation; Worker suffers serious injuries when struck by truck
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff//October 22, 2025//
Action: Mediation
Date: July 29, 2025
Date of incident: Aug. 29, 2022
Nature of claim: Motor vehicle negligence
Injuries alleged: Moderate to severe traumatic brain injury, multiple skull fractures and hemorrhagic contusions to the bilateral frontal, inferior left temporal and anterior right temporal lobes of the brain
Amount: $6 million
Special or other damages: Worker’s compensation lien of $876,000 admissible under N.C. Rule 414
Case name: Withheld
Case no: Withheld
Court: Mecklenburg County Superior Court
Mediator: Bill Brazil, of Brazil & Burke, Asheville
Most helpful experts: Marshall A. White, M.D., of Columbia, S.C., treating neurologist; Shelly Savant, M.D., CLCP, of Lafayette, Louisiana, physician life care planner; Ashley Johnson, Johnson Consulting, of Mooresville, vocational expert; Tricia Yount, CPA, of Yount Forensic Consulting, Charleston, South Carolina, economic damages consultant; and Steve Farlow, P.E., of Accident Reconstruction Analysis, Raleigh, accident reconstruction expert.
Attorneys: Andrew “Drew” Creech, of Elrod Pope Law Firm, Rock Hill, South Carolina, and Trey Cook of Trey Cook Law Firm, Lancaster, South Carolina (for the plaintiff)
Insurance carrier: Withheld
The plaintiff worked on a construction site near a busy intersection in downtown Charlotte. While crossing the intersection on foot in a marked crosswalk with an active crossing signal, the plaintiff was struck by a construction truck driven by the defendant, who was making a left turn.
Early in the investigation, the plaintiff’s counsel secured a statement from an eyewitness, who confirmed that the plaintiff had the right of way, was within the crosswalk and had no opportunity to avoid being struck.
The defendant refused to accept full responsibility. The defense implausibly argued that the plaintiff was contributorily negligent for failing to keep a proper lookout and for not jumping out of the truck’s path. The defendant further attempted to minimize the severity of the impact, claiming he was traveling at 1 to 2 mph and had slammed on the brakes immediately before the collision.
Accident reconstruction data disproved this narrative. The plaintiff’s body was thrown 15 feet backward through the air upon impact. Speed calculations corroborated by the truck’s GPS monitoring system revealed that the vehicle was traveling at 18 mph at the time of impact, with no braking before the collision.
Advanced neuroimaging further validated the seriousness of the plaintiff’s injuries. A 3T MRI — twice as sensitive as a standard 1.5T MRI — and NeuroQuant volumetric analysis, revealed encephalomalacia (dead brain tissue) in multiple regions. The NeuroQuant analysis also demonstrated asymmetrical brain atrophy on the side of the brain corresponding to the primary impact zone. These findings substantiated a comprehensive life care plan, which projected the need for inpatient care later in life due to the plaintiff’s significantly elevated risk of developing early-onset dementia.
All available liability policy limits, totaling $6 million, were tendered.
Related Articles
Top Legal News
- Bulldozer operator settles after losing leg in job site incident
- New York sues Kalshi, says its prediction markets are illegal gambling
- Fiduciary duty claims survive while standalone specific performance claim dismissed
- Judge dismisses suit accusing Zillow of kickback, racketeering schemes
- Settlement agreement did not terminate LLC membership
- Settlement may have mooted insurer’s coverage dispute
- Raleigh ed-tech company pays six figures to resolve EEOC disability discrimination charge
Legal Tech
- AI in practice: How new technology is affecting litigation practice
- Experts foresee legal malpractice risk for those who eschew AI
- Legal Decoder launches AI-powered billing analytics interface
Commentary
- Legally Speaking: How communication failures turn disputes into lawsuits
- We tore out our own backup generator
- When is a PIP an adverse employment action?
- Legally Speaking: What spring can teach us about active listening
- A useful patent management government notice
- Opinion: NC judges have enormous power. Be sure to vote in November
- The third option: Why your best employees are quietly losing their edge
- AI divorce is real, but family law can still save itself




