North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff//April 10, 2026//
North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Staff//April 10, 2026//
The North Carolina Supreme Court affirmed a ruling limiting the plaintiff’s recovery to unjust enrichment after a jury found no enforceable agreement governing work he performed to help the defendant secure investment capital.
The plaintiff had worked for the defendant in a salaried role at Earth Fare but later sought separate compensation for efforts to raise funds for the company. According to the record, he contended this work fell outside his ordinary employment and was instead performed under a distinct arrangement that would have provided him with an ownership interest, a seat on the board of directors and other benefits associated with an outside business partner or investor. When that compensation did not materialize, he sued, asserting claims for breach of contract, unjust enrichment and violation of the North Carolina Wage and Hour Act.
At trial, the Business Court treated the existence of an enforceable agreement as a threshold issue. The jury was instructed that if it found no enforceable agreement governing the capital-raising work, it should not consider the Wage and Hour Act claim. The jury found there was no enforceable contract but also found the defendant had been unjustly enriched by the plaintiff’s efforts and awarded damages on that equitable claim. The plaintiff later sought post-trial relief, including judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial on the statutory wage claim, but the court denied those requests.
The Supreme Court affirmed without a full opinion, leaving intact the Business Court’s conclusion that the plaintiff could not pursue statutory wage protections for the disputed work absent proof of an enforceable arrangement showing he was employed to perform those services. The decision underscores that where such proof is lacking, a plaintiff may still obtain equitable relief for benefits conferred, but not recovery under the Wage and Hour Act.
The 18 page opinion is Talley v. Earth Fare 2020 Inc., Lawyers Weekly No. 010-001-26.