Judges’ pick for Seattle’s federal prosecutor sues Trump after ouster
Reuters//July 22, 2026//
Summary:
- Roger Rogoff sued Trump over alleged unlawful removal
- Rogoff appointed by Western District of Washington judges
- Justice Department defends president’s firing authority
The top federal prosecutor in Seattle who was fired by President Donald Trump last week sued the administration on July 21, in a case testing the president’s authority to remove U.S. attorneys appointed by judges to fill vacancies.
Roger Rogoff’s lawsuit, filed in the federal court in Seattle, said Trump unlawfully removed him as the court-appointed U.S. attorney in the Western District of Washington immediately after he took office on July 15.
The lawsuit contends that federal law allows a court-appointed U.S. attorney to serve until the position is filled by a presidential nominee confirmed by the U.S. Senate.
Rogoff asked the court to declare his firing invalid and rule that he remains the U.S. attorney for the district until a Senate-confirmed successor takes office.
Trump last week removed Rogoff, a former federal prosecutor and state court judge, one hour after the chief judge in the Western District of Washington swore him in as the district’s new U.S. attorney.
“The President’s actions violate the law, and they ignore the protections of the Constitution of the United States,” Rogoff said in a statement. “His removal of me, like his removal of other court-appointed U.S. Attorneys across the country, is illegal and cannot stand.”
The Justice Department in a statement said the district court “did not coordinate with DOJ on this selection. Consistent with other firings of this type, this is wholly within the President’s authority.”
Rogoff was appointed after the U.S. attorney’s office’s top post had remained vacant without a Senate-confirmed nominee. Rogoff is an attorney at the law firm Osborn Machler & Neff.
Acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche said in a social media post last week that Trump had fired Rogoff. “District court judges can appoint a temporary U.S. Attorney, and POTUS can fire them,” Blanche said.
Related Articles
Legal Tech
- How ransomware tactics against law firms are changing
- How large language models are leveling the personal injury playing field
- Attorney Share, Lawmatics integrate to automate law firm referrals
Top Legal News
- US judge casts doubt on 69,000 cases alleging J&J talc caused cancer
- Rockingham County asks NC Supreme Court to toss casino-related rezoning lawsuit
- Dutch judgment may provide alternate route to enforce arbitration award
- Legally Speaking: How communication failures turn disputes into lawsuits
- AG Jackson refuses to sign Duke Energy rate settlement
- Fraud counterclaims fail in dispute over company restructuring
- Judges’ pick for Seattle’s federal prosecutor sues Trump after ouster
Commentary
- Legally Speaking: How communication failures turn disputes into lawsuits
- We tore out our own backup generator
- When is a PIP an adverse employment action?
- Legally Speaking: What spring can teach us about active listening
- A useful patent management government notice
- Opinion: NC judges have enormous power. Be sure to vote in November
- The third option: Why your best employees are quietly losing their edge
- AI divorce is real, but family law can still save itself










